403
Sorry!!
Error! We're sorry, but the page you were looking for doesn't exist.
Maduro’s Capture Rekindles Debate Over “Gunboat Diplomacy”
(MENAFN) A United States military action in Venezuela that resulted in the arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has reignited worldwide discussion about “gunboat diplomacy,” a concept traditionally linked to the application of armed force to accomplish political aims.
The operation, carried out on Jan. 3 by the US Defense Department, reportedly commenced with an attack on Maduro’s private residence in Caracas. American Special Forces, backed by naval and aerial assets, neutralized coastal defenses before taking Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, into custody.
Following their detention, the pair were transported to Manhattan, where they were brought before a federal court to face accusations of “narco-terrorism.”
US officials maintained that the action was “not a military intervention,” characterizing it instead as a law-enforcement arrest executed under the jurisdiction of US judicial authorities.
In contrast, numerous governments have labeled the episode a military incursion against a sovereign nation and the forced removal of its sitting head of state.
The episode has been widely referenced as a modern illustration of “gunboat diplomacy,” defined as the overt deployment of military strength to secure diplomatic or political outcomes, an approach deeply rooted in earlier chapters of US history.
At its core, gunboat diplomacy involves the use or intimidation of armed power to advance foreign policy objectives rather than relying on dialogue or mutual concession.
While this strategy is not exclusive to the United States, many of its most notable historical cases can be traced to dominant military states beginning in the 19th century.
The operation, carried out on Jan. 3 by the US Defense Department, reportedly commenced with an attack on Maduro’s private residence in Caracas. American Special Forces, backed by naval and aerial assets, neutralized coastal defenses before taking Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, into custody.
Following their detention, the pair were transported to Manhattan, where they were brought before a federal court to face accusations of “narco-terrorism.”
US officials maintained that the action was “not a military intervention,” characterizing it instead as a law-enforcement arrest executed under the jurisdiction of US judicial authorities.
In contrast, numerous governments have labeled the episode a military incursion against a sovereign nation and the forced removal of its sitting head of state.
The episode has been widely referenced as a modern illustration of “gunboat diplomacy,” defined as the overt deployment of military strength to secure diplomatic or political outcomes, an approach deeply rooted in earlier chapters of US history.
At its core, gunboat diplomacy involves the use or intimidation of armed power to advance foreign policy objectives rather than relying on dialogue or mutual concession.
While this strategy is not exclusive to the United States, many of its most notable historical cases can be traced to dominant military states beginning in the 19th century.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Most popular stories
Market Research
More Story
Comments
No comment