By Mehak Fayaz and Naveed Ahmad

Ladakh today stands at the meeting point of India's most complex challenges.

The region faces melting glaciers, declining livelihoods, and rising political pressure at a time when China and Pakistan are tightening their strategic grip nearby.

Ladakh's internal tensions now carry national consequences. Any misstep risks unsettling India's security calculus in the northern frontier.

Much of this tension took shape after August 2019, when Ladakh was separated from Jammu and Kashmir and placed under direct central administration.

The decision promised faster development and better governance. It also raised concerns about land ownership, demographic change, and the future of Ladakh's cultural and ecological identity. These concerns grew into public agitation.

The campaign led by Sonam Wangchuk transformed scattered anxieties into a unified movement for statehood and protection under the Sixth Schedule.

The unrest reached its peak with violent clashes that left four people dead and pushed Leh under curfew for the first time in years.

The story often begins with politics. Ladakh's story begins with its mountains.

The region forms a vital part of the Hindu Kush-Himalayan ecosystem, sometimes called the planet's“Third Pole” for the volume of ice stored in its glaciers.

These glaciers feed rivers such as the Indus, Sutlej, and Shyok, which support millions across South Asia.

Glaciers in this system melted 65 percent faster between 2011 and 2020 than in the decade before. If warming continues at the current rate, up to 80 percent of the ice could disappear by the end of the century.

A crisis like this would change water security across Asia. The danger is already real in Ladakh, where farming relies on glacial melt and villages depend on carefully managed water channels.

Traditional livelihoods are already in decline. Families who once relied on barley, apricots, and livestock now struggle to sustain themselves.

The Periodic Labour Force Survey for 2023-24 reports Ladakh's unemployment rate at 21.9 percent. Youth unemployment stands at 33.6 percent, while unemployment among women reaches 45.2 percent.

Young people leave their villages in large numbers for opportunities in cities. Climate stress and joblessness form the two sides of the same crisis.

This is why the demand for autonomy and constitutional protection carries dimensions beyond politics.

Many Ladakhis see the Sixth Schedule as the only safeguard that can protect their land, community rights, and fragile environment from extractive projects. The call is rooted in a desire for survival.

This has raised a difficult question for New Delhi. The ruling party won the region on a manifesto that promised inclusion under the Sixth Schedule and a roadmap to statehood. The promise now stands in suspension.

The hesitation appears driven by strategic choices.

In the past year, teams from nearly twenty large solar power companies have surveyed land in Leh for a proposed 7,500-megawatt project worth ₹45,000 crore. Siemens, ABB, Tata Power Solar, and Adani Green Energy see Ladakh as an ideal site due to its open terrain and high solar radiation.

Central control over land offers a smooth route for such projects. Granting legislative authority to local bodies under the Sixth Schedule could create new layers of negotiation and slow down national energy plans.

Ladakh is also a militarily sensitive region where roads, airstrips, and logistics networks play an essential role. Any shift in land control may complicate defence planning.

The government's caution reflects the fear of weakening its leverage in a region where China and Pakistan maintain close coordination.

Geography adds another layer to this debate. Surveys by the Geological Survey of India near Hanle have found promising concentrations of rare earth elements, which are critical for advanced electronics, lasers, and defence systems.

Earlier studies identified traces of uranium near Udmaru in Nubra Valley, close to the Line of Actual Control. China dominates the global rare earth industry. Slow progress in India's exploration strengthens Beijing's advantage.

Unrest in Ladakh therefore carries implications that reach far beyond the region.

The broader geopolitical stakes intensify this picture.

China's partnership with Pakistan through the $60-billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor has reshaped the strategic map. The corridor links Xinjiang to Gwadar and gives Beijing direct access to the Arabian Sea. Its northern routes run close to Ladakh. India's hold over the Karakoram range gives it potential leverage during conflict.

China's territorial pressure, including the repeated transgressions and the deadly clash in Galwan in 2020, fits into this larger strategy of securing depth around CPEC.

In this environment, loss of trust among Ladakh's own people becomes a serious risk.

Ajai Shukla, the former army officer and defence analyst, often reminds policymakers that unrest in Ladakh must be examined through a three-front lens shaped by India's ties with Pakistan and China. Local alienation weakens India's posture far more than any single military incident.

MENAFN19112025000215011059ID1110369639