(MENAFN- The Rio Times) Ecuador just turned down a dramatic security experiment: letting foreign militaries return to its territory in the middle of a crime wave. For a country living through record levels of killings and extortion, that is a striking choice.

President Daniel Noboa asked voters to change the 2008 constitution, which declares Ecuador a“territory of peace” and bans foreign military bases.

His argument was straightforward: the state is losing ground to drug-linked gangs, so it needs new tools and deeper cooperation with allies.

Two coastal cities, Manta and Salinas, were floated as possible sites – reviving memories of the U.S. anti-narcotics base that operated in Manta until 2009.

Voters said no. In a high-turnout referendum, they rejected lifting the ban on foreign bases, and also blocked a plan to rewrite the constitution through a new assembly, shrink the legislature and cut public funding for political parties.



The message was not gentle: in a single night, four major ideas were sent back to the drawing board. To understand why, you need the backstory.

The 2008 charter was written at the height of a political project that wanted to recast Ecuador from the ground up, including a strong suspicion of foreign security presence.
Ecuador voters favor strong security within stable institutions
Many Ecuadorians now feel trapped between that era's ideological experiments and today's brutal reality of mafias, prison massacres and captured neighbourhoods.

The referendum turned into a proxy battle between two instincts. One side sees foreign hardware and closer military cooperation as a necessary shield while the state rebuilds.

The other fears that once the constitutional lock is gone, future governments could sign far-reaching deals, and that big promises will again distract from the hard work of courts, prosecutors, prisons and local policing.

For expats and foreign readers, this matters beyond Ecuador. The country is now a major corridor for cocaine between its neighbours and global markets, yet its voters have just drawn a clear line on how far emergency measures should go.

The result is a warning to anyone tempted by grand constitutional shortcuts: citizens may live with tough security policies, but they still want them anchored in stable institutions and national control, not in open-ended experiments.

MENAFN17112025007421016031ID1110353797