Reality TV star Kim Kardashian has made a baffling admission this week - claiming that the 1969 Apollo 11 Moon landing was nothing but a staged spectacle. The billionaire entrepreneur revealed she has long believed the mission was an“elaborate hoax,” citing familiar conspiracy arguments that have circulated for decades.

“There's no gravity on the Moon – why is the flag blowing?” Kim reportedly asked.“The shoes that they have in the museum that they wore on the Moon [have] a different [foot]print than the photos. Why are there no stars?”

Her comments have reignited one of the most persistent conspiracy theories in history. But scientists say the evidence proving that humans really walked on the Moon is overwhelming - and impossible to fake.

1. Evidence Left on the Moon

When Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin first set foot on the lunar surface in 1969, they didn't leave it as they found it. Every Apollo mission that followed deposited a trail of equipment - landers, rovers, and scientific instruments - all of which remain there to this day.

Though these artefacts are hard to spot from Earth, modern lunar missions have confirmed their presence. NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), launched in 2009, later mapped the Moon in stunning high resolution, capturing hundreds of terabytes of imagery.

By 2011, the LRO had photographed three Apollo landing sites - Apollo 12, 14, and 17 - in unprecedented detail. In the images, even astronauts' footprints are visible, perfectly preserved on the airless surface for over half a century.

Dr. Greg Brown, an astronomer at the Royal Observatory Greenwich, told the Daily Mail:

“This imagery has been independently verified by institutions across the world, and not just by NASA and the USA.”

He adds that even the data from the instruments left behind continues to provide valuable information today.

Between Apollo 11 and 16, astronauts installed lunar seismometers to record the tremors caused by asteroid impacts. This helped scientists understand the Moon's internal composition.

Perhaps most remarkable, Apollo 11 also placed a lunar laser ranging retroreflector array - a large mirror used to measure the precise distance between Earth and the Moon.

“These are still used today to determine the precise distance to the Moon by bouncing laser light off of them and timing the beam's return,” Dr. Brown explained.“It is these measurements that revealed that the Moon is moving very slowly away from the Earth at around the rate your fingernails grow!”

2. The Rocks That Came Home

If the evidence left on the Moon isn't convincing enough, scientists point to what came back.

Across all Apollo missions, NASA astronauts returned with an astonishing 382 kilograms of lunar rock and soil. These samples were shared with laboratories worldwide - including in Russia and China, both eager to disprove the US achievement during the Cold War.

“That analysis has shown that the Moon's composition, while similar to the Earth in some ways, has some key differences,” said Dr. Brown.

The lunar rocks contain mineral combinations and isotopic ratios unseen on Earth, confirming they could not have been faked.

These samples have also been cross-checked with lunar meteorites - rocks blasted from the Moon's surface by asteroid impacts and later found on Earth - as well as recent samples brought back by China's Chang'e-5 and Chang'e-6 missions.

In over 50 years, no analysis has found a single shred of evidence suggesting the Apollo rocks were fabricated.

“This has lent support to the theory that the Moon likely formed from a collision between the early Earth and a Mars-sized object while the Earth was still mostly molten,” Dr. Brown noted.

3. Faking It Would've Been Harder Than Doing It

Perhaps the most compelling argument, Dr. Brown says, is that faking the Moon landing in 1969 would have been far harder than actually doing it.

“From the Second World War onwards, rocket technology existed that was at least theoretically capable of getting to the Moon. But the technology to fake it did not,” he told the Daily Mail.“As strange as it sounds, the easiest way to fake the Moon landings would have been to film them on location.”

The Apollo missions generated more than 8,000 photographs, countless hours of video, and thousands of pages of transcripts - all publicly available. To this day, not one credible piece of evidence has surfaced showing tampering or forgery.

“In a world of AI imagery and special effects, it is sometimes easy to forget that up until very recently, producing convincing footage of people in space was just not possible,” Dr. Brown said.

Even the Soviet Union, America's fierce rival during the Space Race, never disputed that the U.S. reached the Moon first. That tacit acknowledgment, experts say, speaks volumes.

Radio tracking stations around the world - including amateur observers - also monitored the missions in real-time. A group of students from Kettering Grammar School in England famously tracked U.S. and Soviet spacecraft using homemade radio equipment.

“At the very low end, this means tens of thousands of people were in on the conspiracy, and yet no credible evidence of fakery has ever emerged,” Dr. Brown pointed out.

4. Why There Are No Stars in the Photos

Among Kim Kardashian's claims is the absence of stars in lunar photographs - a detail conspiracy theorists have long seized upon.

But Dr. Brown says this is simply how cameras work:

“Cameras work broadly like our own eyes, capable of seeing bright things and faint things but not equally well at the same time.”

The Moon's daytime lighting is as intense as sunlight on Earth, even though the sky looks black due to the lack of atmosphere. Cameras adjusted for the bright lunar surface simply couldn't capture the faint starlight in the background.

“If you want to try a test for yourself,” Dr. Brown suggested,“go out at night, stand in a bright light and try and get your camera to take a clear image of you while also showing the stars in the background. While not completely impossible, it's very tough to do without a lot of work.”

The Verdict: Reality Outshines Conspiracy

Despite celebrity skepticism, the physical, photographic, and scientific evidence overwhelmingly supports one conclusion: the Moon landings were real.

More than half a century later, the footprints Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin left behind still lie undisturbed - silent proof of humanity's first steps beyond Earth.

And as Dr. Brown aptly puts it,“the easiest way to fake the Moon landings would have been to film them on location.”

MENAFN02112025007385015968ID1110282670