403
Sorry!!
Error! We're sorry, but the page you were looking for doesn't exist.
Sanctioning A Sitting Ally: What The U.S. Move Against Colombia's President Really Means
(MENAFN- The Rio Times) The United States has placed Colombia's President Gustavo Petro on its Specially Designated Nationals list, alongside First Lady Verónica Alcocer, his son Nicolás Petro, and Interior Minister Armando Benedetti.
In Colombia this is known as the“Clinton List.” In practice, it freezes any assets that touch U.S. jurisdiction and bars U.S. persons-and many foreign banks that clear dollars-from doing business with them.
For public officials, that can feel like“civil death”: contracts stall, payments fail, and partners walk away. The story behind the story is about how money moves. The dollar sits at the center of global finance.
Even if a transaction is between two non-U.S. firms, it often runs through a U.S. bank at some point. That gives Washington outsized leverage.
When OFAC designates someone, risk-averse banks worldwide typically“de-risk” and shut accounts rather than jeopardize dollar access. That is why a Washington action can instantly reshape life in Bogotá, Medellín, or Barranquilla.
U.S.–Colombia Sanctions Signal Geopolitical Risk
It is also about a strained partnership. For decades, the U.S.–Colombia relationship has been built on counternarcotics cooperation and trade. Sanctioning a sitting Colombian president is exceptional and signals a break with business as usual.
Washington frames the move around record coca and cocaine levels. Bogotá rejects that narrative, arguing that seizures and anti-laundering actions have risen and that policy differences are being recast as complicity.
The clash lands amid a wider diplomatic freeze: heated rhetoric, threats on visas and tariffs, and disputes over U.S. maritime operations against traffickers.
What people outside Colombia should know is straightforward. First, compliance risk is immediate. Companies, NGOs, and universities that touch U.S. finance must screen every contract and payment; even indirect benefit to a listed person can trigger trouble.
Second, delisting is possible but slow; litigation can take years while consequences begin now. Third, the stakes go beyond one presidency: this will test supply chains, security cooperation, and regional diplomacy across the Andes and the Caribbean.
In short, a technical financial decision has become a geopolitical shock. The dollar's wiring turns a Washington list into a worldwide lock.
In Colombia this is known as the“Clinton List.” In practice, it freezes any assets that touch U.S. jurisdiction and bars U.S. persons-and many foreign banks that clear dollars-from doing business with them.
For public officials, that can feel like“civil death”: contracts stall, payments fail, and partners walk away. The story behind the story is about how money moves. The dollar sits at the center of global finance.
Even if a transaction is between two non-U.S. firms, it often runs through a U.S. bank at some point. That gives Washington outsized leverage.
When OFAC designates someone, risk-averse banks worldwide typically“de-risk” and shut accounts rather than jeopardize dollar access. That is why a Washington action can instantly reshape life in Bogotá, Medellín, or Barranquilla.
U.S.–Colombia Sanctions Signal Geopolitical Risk
It is also about a strained partnership. For decades, the U.S.–Colombia relationship has been built on counternarcotics cooperation and trade. Sanctioning a sitting Colombian president is exceptional and signals a break with business as usual.
Washington frames the move around record coca and cocaine levels. Bogotá rejects that narrative, arguing that seizures and anti-laundering actions have risen and that policy differences are being recast as complicity.
The clash lands amid a wider diplomatic freeze: heated rhetoric, threats on visas and tariffs, and disputes over U.S. maritime operations against traffickers.
What people outside Colombia should know is straightforward. First, compliance risk is immediate. Companies, NGOs, and universities that touch U.S. finance must screen every contract and payment; even indirect benefit to a listed person can trigger trouble.
Second, delisting is possible but slow; litigation can take years while consequences begin now. Third, the stakes go beyond one presidency: this will test supply chains, security cooperation, and regional diplomacy across the Andes and the Caribbean.
In short, a technical financial decision has become a geopolitical shock. The dollar's wiring turns a Washington list into a worldwide lock.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Most popular stories
Market Research
More Story
Comments
No comment