Madras HC Orders CBI Probe Into BSP Leader Armstrong's Murder
Justice P. Velmurugan delivered the order while allowing a petition filed by Armstrong's brother, K. Immanuvel, who sought a CBI probe on the grounds that the local police had failed to conduct a fair investigation.
Armstrong was brutally hacked to death by an armed gang in Perambur on July 5, 2024.
During earlier hearings, the judge had pulled up the city police for not conducting an identification parade despite the presence of several eyewitnesses.
“Most criminal cases end in acquittal due to poor investigation. This case is a classic example,” he observed, rejecting the police contention that CCTV footage and media publication of accused photos made the parade unnecessary.
“Was the media the eyewitness to the crime?” he asked. According to the prosecution, Armstrong was murdered in the presence of his brother, K. Veeramani, who sustained stab injuries while attempting to shield him, along with other associates. Veeramani had explicitly stated that he could identify the assailants, yet no parade was held.
The city police, in their counter affidavit, claimed they had carried out a professional investigation through a Special Investigation Team led by a Joint Commissioner of Police and comprising 80 personnel. They said the murder was linked to gang rivalry and revenge for the 2023 killing of 'Arcot' Suresh.
A 7,087-page charge sheet was filed against 30 accused, including family members and associates of Suresh. The police named convict Nagendran, already lodged in Vellore Central Prison, as the prime accused.
They added that two accused advocates, Shambhava Senthil and 'Mottai' Krishnan, remained absconding, while Red Corner Notices had been issued to trace Senthil abroad. The SIT informed the court that weapons, country-made bombs, vehicles, Rs 63.13 lakh in cash, and even a Zomato delivery uniform used for disguise were seized during the investigation.
They also invoked the Goondas Act against the accused. Despite these measures, the court held that the lapses, particularly the failure to conduct an identification parade, undermined the investigation.
Relying on Supreme Court precedent, Justice Velmurugan concluded that the case merited transfer to the CBI“to cull out the truth.”

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Most popular stories
Market Research

- New Cryptocurrency Mutuum Finance (MUTM) Raises $15.8M As Phase 6 Reaches 40%
- Bydfi Joins Korea Blockchain Week 2025 (KBW2025): Deepening Web3 Engagement
- Yield Basis Nears Mainnet Launch As Curve DAO Votes On Crvusd Proposal
- 0G Labs Launches Aristotle Mainnet With Largest Day-One Ecosystem For Decentralized AI
- Ethereum-Based Defi Crypto Mutuum Finance (MUTM) Raises Over $16 Million With More Than 720M Tokens Sold
- Fintech's Gender Gap In Focus: Drofa Comms' Women Leading The Way Joins Evolvh3r's She Connects At TOKEN2049
Comments
No comment