All Is Not Lost For China In US Tiktok Deal

Latest stories

Agni-5: India missile test narrows nuclear gap with China

Trump wrath looms over secret Vietnam-Russia arms-oil deal

China, Russia's gray zone tactics raising risk of wider war

“China's rights to development must not be compromised, and its determination to defend legitimate interests is unwavering. Any attempt to force China into making fundamental concessions through pressure is unrealistic,” he says.“The US should lift its unilateral trade restrictions to avoid derailing hard-won negotiation progress.”

He says that China and the US can achieve mutual success and shared prosperity, bringing benefits to both nations and the world. However, he adds, this can be reached only if both sides act with the responsibility of major powers, stay aligned in direction and work together.

Before the Bessent-He meeting, Zhongsheng said in an article published on September 14 that it should not always be the Chinese side to compromise.

“The US should move in step with China and create an open, fair and non‐discriminatory environment for Chinese firms investing in America,” he says.“China's right to development cannot be undermined, and any attempt to force Beijing into concessions through pressure is unrealistic.”

After the meeting, Trump once again extended the deadline for ByteDance to divest from TikTok from September 17 to December 16. The deadline has been extended three times already, with Trump threatening to ban TikTok's operations in the US.

Some observers see this development as Beijing's second concession in three months after China agreed to resume rare earth shipments to the US in June.

'China did not lose'

TikTok's US business is the company's crown jewel, drawing in 170 million monthly active users and 82.2 million daily users, according to industry data . Last year, TikTok's US revenue hit $10 billion, underscoring its commercial weight alongside its cultural impact.

In the US, adult users spend an average of 52 minutes a day on the app-far more than on Instagram (35 minutes) or Facebook (30 minutes), while more than half of its weekly users are under 35.

US TikTok users by age, according to company data:

• 18–24: 25%
• 25–34: 30%
• 35–44: 19%
• 45–54: 13%
• 55+: 14%

Globally, TikTok has 1.12 billion monthly active users and a potential ad reach approaching 1.94 billion people, making it one of the world's most powerful social media platforms.

In the first six months of 2025, the app was downloaded over 436 million times, cementing its position as a dominant force in the attention economy. The US market, however, remains its most strategic and politically sensitive arena.

According to reports on the structure of the pending deal, the US entity would be majority‐owned by American investors.

The White House said Americans will take six of seven seats on the board of TikTok's US business, ensuring majority oversight. Oracle and other US firms are expected to play a central role in security and management. ByteDance would remain a minority shareholder, while continuing to provide technical support for the platform's daily operations.

Some Chinese commentators acknowledged that the US will benefit from the acquisition, but insisted that does not mean China has lost in the negotiations.

“Some argue that China is at a disadvantage in this contest, but that conclusion does not necessarily hold,” a Henan-based columnist using the pen name of“Zebra” says.

“TikTok's capital structure has long been 'Americanized,' while daily decisions remain under the ByteDance team. This setup was designed to avoid the stigma of a 'Chinese capital threat' and to prevent unnecessary bans.”

He says the fading of Chinese capital in TikTok's US business is a proactive strategy to neutralize Washington's national security narrative.

“While the US gains political and financial leverage from the deal, TikTok's algorithm, the core of the app's technological power and strategic value, remains firmly under Beijing's purview,” he says.“TikTok's competitive edge remains intact, and operational initiative continues to rest with the Chinese side, not with the shareholders.”