Scorpio Gold Reports Maiden Mineral Resource Estimate And Historical Mineral Resource Estimate
Cut-off grade | Tonnes ≥ cut-off | Average gold grade ≥ cut-off | Gold Contained |
Au (g/t) | kt | Au (g/t) | koz |
0.1 | 28,378 | 0.88 | 802 |
0.2 | 23,006 | 1.05 | 777 |
0.3 (Selected) | 18,342 | 1.26 | 740 |
0.4 | 14,496 | 1.49 | 696 |
0.5 | 11,762 | 1.74 | 657 |
0.6 | 9,754 | 1.98 | 622 |
0.7 | 8,232 | 2.23 | 590 |
0.8 | 7,124 | 2.46 | 563 |
0.9 | 6,280 | 2.68 | 540 |
1 | 5,561 | 2.90 | 518 |
Notes:
Inferred resource estimates are based on economically constrained open pits generated using the Hochbaum Pseudoflow algorithm in Datamine's Studio NPVS and the following optimization parameters (all dollar values are in US dollars):
Inferred Resource classification only.
- $2,500/ounce gold price. Mill recovery of 90% for gold. 50 degree pit slope angle for in-situ rock, 30 degree pit slope angle for overburden. Mining costs of $3.00 per tonne for both ore and waste. Milling costs of $15.00 per tonne processed. G&A cost of $3.50 per tonne processed. 2% royalty costs. A 0.3 g/t gold only cutoff was applied for Inferred resource reporting.
Ore loss and dilution not applied.
The NI 43-101 mineral resource estimate was based on a total of 92,635 m of drilling completed in 1,341 drillholes. Estimates of mineral resources were completed using a three-dimensional block model with a regular block size of 5x5x5 m, with estimation domains constructed based on modeled mineralization controls and geostatistical analysis of the drill sample data. The effects of potentially anomalous high-grade sample data are controlled using traditional top-cutting as well as limiting the distance of influence during block grade interpolation. Inferred resources were classified based on a drill data spacing of 50 m or less (25 m to the closest drillhole), considering blocks which were estimated using two or more drillholes only; Measured or Indicated resources were not classified. Model validation for the final reported Inverse Distance Cubed (ID3) estimate includes statistical validation using Ordinary Kriging (OK) and Nearest Neighbor (NN) estimates, Swath plot comparisons between composite data and the three estimation methods, visual validation on cross sections and plan levels, and grade-tonnage envelopes from Sequential Gaussian Simulation. The estimated Inferred mineral resources are contained within an economically constrained open pit generated using the Hochbaum Pseudoflow algorithm in Datamine's Studio NPVS1.
An NI 43-101 technical report detailing the mineral resource estimate for the Manhattan Project will be completed and filed on SEDAR+ ( ) and Scorpio's website ( ) within 45 days.
Figure 2. Inferred Resource Block Model and Resource Pit
To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
Figure 3. Long-Section DD-DD' showing Inferred Block Model and Geology for the Manhattan Goldwedge Area
To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
Historical MRE
The Historical MRE was completed at the Keystone, Black Mammoth, Hooligan, April Fool, and Jumbo areas of the Project in 1997 by New Concept Mining, Inc. utilizing an open pit scenario.
Table 1. Historical MRE - Imperial Units, as stated in source report.
Area | Proven-Probable | Possible | ||||
Tons | Grade Oz/Ton | Oz | Tons | Grade Oz/Ton | Oz | |
Keystone | 132,226 | 0.112 | 14,867 | 283,685 | 0.352 | 99,707 |
Black Mammoth | 12,000 | 0.125 | 1,500 | 250,000 | 0.2 | 50,000 |
Hooligan | 220,265 | 0.063 | 13,794 | 190,947 | 0.187 | 35,722 |
April Fool | 361,602 | 0.044 | 15,775 | 150,000 | 0.2 | 30,000 |
Jumbo | 16,304 | 0.099 | 1,606 | 204,348 | 0.201 | 40,978 |
TOTALS: | 742,397 | 0.064 | 47,542 | 1,078,980 | 0.238 | 256,407 |
Notes:
Source: A. Berry and P. Willard, 1997. "Exploration and Pre-Production Mine Development, Manhattan District Project, Nye County", a report prepared by New Concept Mining, Inc. The Historical MRE was based on the following assumptions: (a) Proven, Probable and Possible categorizations are historical and in accordance with the U.S. Bureau of Mines in 1943 and as recommended by the Society of Economic Geologists in 1956; (b) open pit mining method; (c) polygonal estimation method, (d) for Proven category a search radius approximating to 15 feet up and down dip and 25 feet along strike; for Probable category a search radius approximating to 75-90 feet up and down dip and 90-150 feet along strike; and for Possible category a search radius approximating to 50 feet up and down dip from Probable material and 90-150 feet along strike, (e) mineral resource tonnage and grades were reported as undiluted, (f) fire assay gold grades used in estimation we uncut; and (g) contained Au ounces are in-situ and did not include recovery losses. Strike and dip orientations were determined by variography at the time. Mineral resource tonnage and contained metal were not rounded to reflect the accuracy of the Historical MRE. The reader is cautioned that the Historical MRE is considered historical in nature and as such is based on prior data and reports prepared by previous property owners. A Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to classify the Historical MRE as a current resource and the Company is not treating the Historical MRE as a current resource. Significant data compilation, re-drilling, re-sampling and data verification may be required by a qualified person before the historical estimate on the t can be classified as a current resource. There can be no assurance that any of the Historical MRE, in whole or in part, will ever become economically viable. In addition, mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. Even if classified as a current resource, there is no certainty as to whether further exploration will result in any mineral resources being upgraded to another category.Table 2. Historical MRE - Metric Units
Area | Proven-Probable | Possible | ||||
Tonnes | Grade Grams/Tonne | Grams | Tonnes | Grade Grams/Tonnes | Grams | |
Keystone | 119,953 | 3.48 | 462,416 | 377,303 | 12.05 | 3,101,237 |
Black Mammoth | 10,886 | 3.89 | 46,655 | 237,682 | 6.86 | 1,555,175 |
Hooligan | 199,821 | 1.96 | 429,042 | 373,045 | 6.41 | 1,111,079 |
April Fool | 328,040 | 1.37 | 490,658 | 464,118 | 6.86 | 933,105 |
Jumbo | 14,791 | 3.08 | 49,952 | 200,172 | 6.88 | 1,274,559 |
TOTALS: | 673,491 | 2.00 | 1,478,723 | 1,652,320 | 7.946 | 7,975,155 |
Notes:
Conversion of tons (U.S. short tons) to tonnes (metric tonnes) by multiplying tons by 0.9071847. Conversion of ounces to grams by multiplying ounces by 31.1035 Source: A. Berry and P. Willard, 1997. "Exploration and Pre-Production Mine Development, Manhattan District Project, Nye County", a report prepared by New Concept Mining, Inc. The Historical MRE was based on the following assumptions: (a) Proven, Probable and Possible categorizations are historical and in accordance with the U.S. Bureau of Mines in 1943 and as recommended by the Society of Economic Geologists in 1956; (b) open pit mining method; (c) polygonal estimation method, (d) for Proven category a search radius approximating to 15 feet up and down dip and 25 feet along strike; for Probable category a search radius approximating to 75-90 feet up and down dip and 90-150 feet along strike; and for Possible category a search radius approximating to 50 feet up and down dip from Probable material and 90-150 feet along strike, (e) mineral resource tonnage and grades were reported as undiluted, (f) fire assay gold grades used in estimation we uncut; and (g) contained Au ounces are in-situ and did not include recovery losses. Strike and dip orientations were determined by variography at the time. Mineral resource tonnage and contained metal were not rounded to reflect the accuracy of the Historical MRE. The reader is cautioned that the Historical MRE is considered historical in nature and as such is based on prior data and reports prepared by previous property owners. A Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to classify the Historical MRE as a current resource and the Company is not treating the Historical MRE as a current resource. Significant data compilation, re-drilling, re-sampling and data verification may be required by a qualified person before the historical estimate on the t can be classified as a current resource. There can be no assurance that any of the Historical MRE, in whole or in part, will ever become economically viable. In addition, mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. Even if classified as a current resource, there is no certainty as to whether further exploration will result in any mineral resources being upgraded to another category.The following is a brief description of the data used for the Historical MRE and the geology of each area:
Table 3. Description Of Data Used In Historical MRE.
Area | Geological Description | Data used in Historical MRE |
Keystone and Jumbo | Hosted in fine grained clastic sediments, breccias and a felsic stock complex with extensive brecciation. Mineralization is classic low sulphidation epithermal type, with extensive drusy quartz and carbonate textures in veins and breccia fill with pyrite and its oxidation products and associated clays. Mineralization appears to be focussed along a north-west trending fault system. Keystone and Jumbo's fault systems strike towards each other over 600 m. | Historical MRE for Keystone and Jumbo are based on exploration and mine development drilling by Nevada Goldfields Inc. Significant historical open pit and underground mining exists at the Keystone deposit. Keystone and Jumbo have a combined 41 drillholes totalling 4,880 m. |
Black Mammoth | Gold mineralization is hosted in near vertical zones of calcite dominant veining and blossom into the receptive Zanzibar limestone, and argillite beds that comprise the Black Mammoth hill. This zone represents the north-west extension of the Gold Wedge area. Had historical production up to the 1930's. | Historical MRE is based on surface sampling and sampling of the extensive underground historical working on the Black Mammoth hill. |
Hooligan | Historical MRE contained within two outcropping mantos of mineralised limestone of 9.7ft thickness and 13.8ft thickness. Hooligan is comprised of the historical Cabin, Manto, Blanket, and Hooligan Mines. | 17 RC drill holes totalling 3,890 ft drilled by New Concept Mining. Additional data came from samples from historical shafts, 16 historical rotary holes drilled in a 25 ft spaced grid of 200 ft x 500 ft. Hooligan has a total of 15 RC drill holes. |
April Fool | Low sulphidation mineralization hosted in Cambrian sediments and limestones. The geologic understanding at the time of the Historical MRE was poor. | Significant historical underground mining and "widely spaced" drill holes with "significant" gold intercepts reported. At least ten holes have been drilled on this prospect, and details and results are currently being sourced and compiled. |
Mineralization Controls and Exploration Targets
At Manhattan, generally extremely high-grade gold mineralization occurs in structures that are mostly high angle and metres to tens of metres wide. Where these structures intersect adjacent zones of fracture induced permeability it can form breccias or strongly veined mineralised bodies. Similarly, where they intersect receptive, often flat-lying carbonate beds, the gold mineralization can "blow-out" to form breccias or along the beds forming stacked mantos. Surrounding the high-grade structures, there is an envelope of progressively lower gold grades that can extend up to hundreds of metres of the central structural "feeder" zone. The underground mines in the district have historically targeted the high-grade structures and proximal zones, but Scorpio Gold is initially targeting open pit resources that comprise these high-grade zones and the surrounding mineralised envelope, as determined by the cut-off grade used at the time. This has already taken place historically at Manhattan with the West, East, USD, ISP, Keystone and Jumbo open pits all having enveloped older small underground mines.
Historical drilling does not extend beyond a vertical depth of approximately 300 m. The Company believes that there are numerous exploration targets that will be the subject of future exploration. Future, deeper drill holes will explore for high-grade targets where feeders intersect structural intersections, down-dip projections of receptive bed and fold closures.
To date, over 6,000 m has been drilled in 13 diamond drill holes and the Company plans add a RC drill rig to the diamond rig currently operating at the Project in September.
The Company cautions that any future exploration targets identified in these areas will be conceptual in nature; there has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource, and it is uncertain whether further work will result in a current mineral resource being delineated.
About the Manhattan District
Manhattan, located in the Walker Lane Trend of Nevada, USA, is road accessible and lies approximately 20 kilometres south of the operating Round Mountain Gold Mine, which has produced more than 15 million ounces of gold. For the first time, the Company has consolidated the district's past-producing mines under a single entity that holds valuable permitting and water rights. Historically, Manhattan has produced approximately 700,000 ounces of gold from high-grade placer and lode operations dating from the late 1890s through to the mid-2000s (Goldwedge Project Technical Report, 2005). The deposit is interpreted as a low-sulfidation, epithermal, gold-rich system situated adjacent to the Tertiary-aged Manhattan caldera in the Southern Toquima Range of Nevada.
Technical Disclosure
Qualified Person
Leo Hathaway, P. Geo, Executive Technical Director of the Company, a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (" NI 43-101 "), has approved the scientific and technical information contained in this news release.
Historical Estimates
The Historical MRE was prepared prior to the adoption of the current CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (" CIM Definition Standards ") and NI 43-101. The terms used in the source report (e.g., "Resource") may not be consistent with the definitions set out in the CIM Definition Standards, as adopted in NI 43-101, and are therefore not necessarily indicative of mineral resources under these standards.
Specifically, due to lower modern cut-off grades, historical and future open pit resources are expected to be higher tonnage and lower grade (relatively), than the Historical MRE. However, the reader is cautioned that the Historical MRE may overestimate gold grade and therefore total gold inventory for reasons including, but not limited to: (a) the polygonal method distribution of grade spatially, being more liberal than most modern methods, (b) not allowing for internal dilution, and (c) no restriction on the influence of extremely high grade samples, whereas extremely high grades may be restricted in modern estimates, not least because at modern gold prices they represent more value than they did at the date of the Historical MRE. Additionally, some production from Gold Wedge occurred since the date of the Historical MRE. This is believed to be in the region of 40,000oz Au, but this cannot be confirmed from the past production records available.
The Historical MRE uses historical categories and terminology that differ from NI 43-101 categories; the Company provides the historical categories as originally reported.
The Historical MRE was reported in imperial units. For consistency and ease of comparison, the Company has converted the figures into metric units for purposes of this news release. The conversions were made using standard factors and may result in minor rounding differences.
A Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to classify the Historical MRE as a current mineral resource or reserve. The Company is not treating the Historical MRE as current mineral resources or reserves, and they should not be relied upon.
Historical Production
The historical production figures disclosed in this news release are derived from past operator records that pre-date the implementation of NI 43-101. A Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to verify these figures, and the Company is not treating them as current mineral resources or reserves.
About Scorpio Gold Corp.
Scorpio Gold holds a 100% interest in the Manhattan District project, a past producing project located in the Walker Lane Trend of Nevada, USA. Scorpio Gold's Manhattan District is ~4,780-hectares and comprises the advanced exploration-stage Goldwedge Mine, with a 400 ton per day maximum capacity gravity mill, and four past-producing pits that were acquired from Kinross in 2021 (see March 25, 2021 news release). The consolidated Manhattan District presents an exciting late-stage exploration opportunity, with over 100,000 metres of historical drilling, significant resource potential, and valuable permitting and water rights.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF SCORPIO GOLD CORPORATION

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Most popular stories
Market Research

- Japan Buy Now Pay Later Market Size To Surpass USD 145.5 Billion By 2033 CAGR Of 22.23%
- BTCC Summer Festival 2025 Unites Japan's Web3 Community
- GCL Subsidiary, 2Game Digital, Partners With Kucoin Pay To Accept Secure Crypto Payments In Real Time
- Smart Indoor Gardens Market Growth: Size, Trends, And Forecast 20252033
- Nutritional Bar Market Size To Expand At A CAGR Of 3.5% During 2025-2033
- Pluscapital Advisor Empowers Traders To Master Global Markets Around The Clock
Comments
No comment