Swiss Cantons Refuse To Abandon Mention Of Skin Colour In Police Alerts
-
Français
fr
Zurich et Berne critiquent la directive sur le système de recherche
Original
Read more: Zurich et Berne critiquent la directive sur le système de recherch
We do not agree with Fedpol's decision to stop mentioning skin colour in the Ripol search system, writes Zurich government member Philipp Müller in a letter sent to the federal office on Wednesday.
+Get the most important news from Switzerland in your inbox
The cantonal director of security said he was“surprised, as it seems that no attempt has been made to involve the cantons, which are responsible for internal security, and in particular the cantonal police forces, which are an essential part of the criminal prosecution chain”.
'Wrong and unhelpful'Müller went on to criticise the decision for being“objectively wrong”, as it unnecessarily complicates the investigative work of police forces in important cases. In his letter, Müller calls on Fedpol to reverse its decision and enter into dialogue with the cantons.
His counterpart in Zurich, Mario Fehr, was quoted in the NZZ paper as saying that the directive, which is intended to follow a widespread practice abroad, was“not very useful” and“politically motivated”. The Zurich police confirmed that they will continue to refer to all important characteristics, which in their view include skin colour.
For their part, the Fribourg and Geneva cantonal police forces have taken note of the directive issued last week by Fedpol. Its application requires“an in-depth analysis of the operational context in particular”, explains the Geneva cantonal police.
The Fribourg police, for their part, feel that it is too early for any concrete action at this stage, and will be analysing the possible impact of Fedpol's decision.
Across the Sarine, the Basel cantonal police say they will continue to use the Ripol database as proposed, while the Lucerne police intend to comply with Fedpol directives. Their counterparts in Ticino point out that the Ripol database is the responsibility of the Federal Office.
Rare useAccording to the Fedpol, mentioning the colour of a person's skin (white, black or brown) when issuing an alert had been called into question for some time. Discussions with foreign partners showed that skin colour was not used as a precise description in some agencies, notably Interpol.
As a result, this criterion was already virtually no longer used as an element of the alert in the Swiss search system, where it appeared in less than 1% of cases. The Neuchâtel cantonal police have also indicated that their computer system does not allow skin colour to be mentioned and that they have therefore never used this concept.
Descriptive aid Vs racial profilingAccording to Patrice Zumsteg, researcher and lecturer in fundamental rights and police law at Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), there are different types of profiling. Descriptive profiling is used in criminal investigations to find out what a wanted person looks like. In this context, skin colour can be a useful criterion, he says.
It only becomes problematic when the opposite approach is adopted where it is assumed that a person is a criminal simply because they belong to a certain ethnic group. This is known as racial profiling. According to Zumsteg, targeted manhunts and racial profiling are two very different things. The removal of typologies such as 'Asian', 'Oriental' or 'Slavic' did not pose a problem.
Adapted from French by DeepL/ac
We select the most relevant news for an international audience and use automatic translation tools to translate them into English. A journalist then reviews the translation for clarity and accuracy before publication.
Providing you with automatically translated news gives us the time to write more in-depth articles. The news stories we select have been written and carefully fact-checked by an external editorial team from news agencies such as Bloomberg or Keystone.
If you have any questions about how we work, write to us at ...
Related Stories Popular Stories More International Geneva A Geneva-based global health foundation came close to 'collapse'. Where were regulators? Read more: A Geneva-based global health foundation came close to 'collapse'. Where were regulators?
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Most popular stories
Market Research

- Japan Buy Now Pay Later Market Size To Surpass USD 145.5 Billion By 2033 CAGR Of 22.23%
- BTCC Summer Festival 2025 Unites Japan's Web3 Community
- GCL Subsidiary, 2Game Digital, Partners With Kucoin Pay To Accept Secure Crypto Payments In Real Time
- Smart Indoor Gardens Market Growth: Size, Trends, And Forecast 20252033
- Nutritional Bar Market Size To Expand At A CAGR Of 3.5% During 2025-2033
- Pluscapital Advisor Empowers Traders To Master Global Markets Around The Clock
Comments
No comment