Patna High Court Scraps 65% Reservations For Backward Classes, Ebcs, Scs & Sts; Check Details

2024-06-20 04:00:30

(MENAFN- AsiaNet News) The Patna High Court on Thursday made a significant ruling by invalidating the Bihar Reservation of Vacancies in Posts and Services (Amendment) Act, 2023, along with The Bihar (In admission in Educational Institutions) Reservation (Amendment) Act, 2023.

This decision effectively abolishes the 65% reservation quota previously allocated for Backward Classes, Economically Backward Classes (EBCs), Scheduled Castes (SCs), and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in the state.

Telangana Police SI arrested, dismissed for alleged rape of woman constable at gunpoint

The court declared these amendments as ultra vires and in violation of the equality clauses enshrined in Articles 14, 15, and 16 of the Indian Constitution.

Chief Justice K Vinod Chandran and Justice Harish Kumar delivered a judgment on a series of petitions challenging the 2023 amendments made by the Bihar legislature regarding reservations.

The Bihar government, under Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, decided to increase reservations for Backward Classes, Extremely Backward Classes (EBC), Scheduled Castes (SC), and Scheduled Tribes (ST). On November 9, the Bihar Assembly unanimously passed a bill to raise these reservations from the existing 50% to 65%.

With the inclusion of the 10% quota for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS), the total reservation in Bihar now stands at 75%, exceeding the 50% cap set by the Supreme Court.

The Bihar Reservation Amendment Bill raised the quota for Extremely Backward Classes (EBC) from 18% to 25%, for Backward Classes (BC) from 12% to 18%, for Scheduled Castes (SC) from 16% to 20%, and for Scheduled Tribes (ST) from 1% to 2%.

Supreme Court issues notice on NTA's plea to transfer NEET-UG 2024 cases, stays HC proceedings

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed, arguing that the constitutional provisions for reservations are meant to ensure proper representation of socially and educationally backward classes, not to provide reservations proportional to the population. The PIL contended that the amendments violated fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution, including the right to equal opportunity in government jobs and protection against discrimination.

MENAFN20062024007385015968ID1108352045

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.