Defiant VP Duterte Lashes At Lawmakers Dismisses Impeachment Complaints As 'Recycled'
In an ad cautelam response to the committee, Duterte said the complaints - declared as sufficient in form and substance 10 days ago - are“no different from the 2025 articles of impeachment” filed against her.
Recommended For You UAE's Golden Visa creates stability in property market, loyalty among homeownersAn ad cautelam (Latin, meaning“with caution”) is a procedural manoeuvre that, while responding, refuses to acknowledge the recipient's jurisdiction. It is referred to in legal circles as a“just in case” measure.
Duterte pointed out that last year's complaints were declared void by the Philippine Senate and Supreme Court and "must be dismissed.”
Stay up to date with the latest news. Follow KT on WhatsApp channels.
“The Impeachment Complaints recycle the same accusations against [me] as those contained in the nullified Fourth Impeachment Complaint filed by the 19th HOR, including conjectures, speculations, and conclusions of facts and law, which do not constitute ultimate facts,” her response reads.
Duterte said she objects to the proceedings that seek her removal from position and possible disqualification from any government office, adding she reserves the right to exhaust legal remedies against them.
Duterte's supporters, meanwhile, maintain the impeachment complaints are attempts to disqualify her from a possible presidential candidacy in 2028. The vice president in February announced seeking the Philippines' highest elective office in the next national elections.
'C onfused interpretation 'A COJ member, however, said the vice president's reply failed to squarely address the allegations contained in the two impeachment complaints approved by the committee.
“Instead of responding directly to the charges, it attempts to challenge the impeachment proceedings itself based on a confused interpretation of due process and the concept of ultimate facts in impeachment cases,” Rep. Terry Ridon told Khaleej Times.
Ridon, a member of the HOR's majority bloc, denied Duterte was deprived of due process and is, in fact, afforded every opportunity, as proven by her ad cautelam reply.
The lawmaker said it is likewise incorrect for Duterte to claim that the impeachment complaints against her failed to state ultimate facts.
The complaints clearly established ultimate facts on the vice president's alleged misuse of public funds, issuance of death threats against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and family, and her unexplained wealth, Ridon said.
“These allegations go to the very heart of public accountability and constitutional responsibility,” Ridon, who is also a lawyer, said.
What's nextDuterte's reply, if dismissed by the COJ, will pave the way for an HOR plenary debate on whether Duterte would be impeached for the second straight year.
Following leadership changes in the Philippine Senate last year, it is expected that Duterte would face a full impeachment trial later this year
ALSO READ- Philippine VP Sara Duterte's impeachment raps found 'sufficient in form' Philippine VP Sara Duterte impeachment declared sufficient in substance, 54-1 Sara Duterte's presidential bid won't affect charges of sedition and grave threats
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Comments
No comment