China's Actions In South China Sea Undermine International Legal Order: Report
According to a report in Myanmar's media outlet 'The Irrawaddy', China's stated commitment to upholding international law appears hollow amid growing evidence of systematic violations of the UNCLOS - a treaty Beijing ratified in 1996.
“The scene of these egregious violations is the South China Sea, where China lays spurious claim to sovereignty over the Scarborough Shoal, a resource-rich atoll in the Philippines' so-called Exclusive Economic Zone. Known as Bajo de Masinloc in the Philippines and Huangyan Island in Chinese, the shoal has been effectively occupied by a permanent Chinese Coast Guard presence since a 2012 standoff, both because of the rich fishing grounds that surround it and its strategic position on international shipping routes,” the report detailed.
“An international arbitration ruling in 2016 invalidated China's expansive claims and found that the shoal is a traditional fishing ground for several nations. But rather than abiding by the arbitration it signed up to, China has responded by escalating its maritime aggression, combined with a coordinated disinformation campaign designed to obscure its illegality,” it added.
The report highlighted that China's Coast Guard presence at the Scarborough Shoal more than doubled in 2025, with 1,094“ship days,” patrolling the area - compared to 516 in 2024 - maintaining a near daily presence in the disputed territory.
If China, the report said, can reject binding tribunal judgments, flout ratified treaty obligations, and suppress facts through diplomatic coercion and narrative warfare, it sets a dangerous precedent.
“The Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Brunei have so far maintained remarkable restraint and fidelity to international law in the South China Sea. They were rewarded with escalating coercion, disinformation campaigns, and intimidation,” it mentioned.
“The choice before the international community is clear: either maritime law grants coastal states enforceable rights within their EEZs, or it does not. Either arbitration rulings are binding, or they are suggestions. Either UNCLOS signatories are obligated to comply, or international law is merely rhetoric. China's conduct is a test for the whole world: will it permit these principles to be abandoned?” the report questioned.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Comments
No comment