(MENAFN- Live Mint) Justice Surya Kant, set to take oath as the 53rd Chief Justice of India on Monday, said that he decides a case based on“facts and law” and is largely unaffected by social media trolls who attempt to misrepresent, misquote or selectively extract court observations.

Justice Kant has been part of several landmark verdicts and orders on abrogation of Article 370 removing Jammu and Kashmir's special status, Bihar electoral rolls revision and Pegasus spyware case.

He will succeed Justice B R Gavai. Justice Kant will remain in the post for nearly 15 months; he will demit office on 9 February 2027 on attaining the age of 65 years.

Also Read | Justice Kant to be sworn in amid judges from 6 nations - a first for India 'Not affected by trolls...': Justice Kant

Justice Surya Kant told the media that he has never been pressured by campaigns or motivated by reporting on social media.“I think an overwhelming majority of judges would not be affected by social media trolls as they decide cases based on facts and law,” he said.

Outlining his priorities as the CJI, Justice Kant said that during his tenure, he would focus on developing a strategy to reduce the pendency of 90,000 cases in the Supreme Court and around 5 crore cases in HCs and district courts.

Justice Kant also said that listing of long-pending bunch cases would get priority. He highlighted that thousands of cases, raising the same or similar questions of law, are pending in various High Courts, which have deferred hearing them in anticipation of SC verdicts.

Also Read | Justice Surya Kant appointed next Chief Justice of India, oath on November 24 About Justice Surya Kant

Born on 10 February 1962 in Hisar district of Haryana to a middle-class family, Justice Kant went from being a small-town lawyer to the country's highest judicial office, where he has been part of several verdicts and orders of national importance and constitutional matters. He also has the distinction of standing 'first class first' in his Master's degree in law in 2011 from Kurukshetra University.

Justice Kant, who penned several notable judgments in the Punjab and Haryana HC, was appointed the chief justice of Himachal Pradesh HC on October 5, 2018.

His tenure as an SC judge is marked by verdicts on the abrogation of Article 370, free speech and citizenship rights.

The judge was part of the recent presidential reference on the powers of the Governor and President in dealing with bills passed by a state assembly. The verdict is keenly awaited with potential ramifications across states.

He was part of the bench that kept the colonial-era sedition law in abeyance, directing that no new FIRs be registered under it until a government review.

Justice Kant also nudged the Election Commission to disclose the details of 65 lakh voters excluded from the draft electoral rolls in Bihar while hearing a batch of petitions challenging the poll panel's decision to undertake Special Intensive Revision (SIR ) of the voters list in the poll-bound state.

Also Read | SC judge Surya Kant commends Operation Sindoor, says 'we should feel proud'

In an order that emphasised grassroots democracy and gender justice, he led a bench that reinstated a woman sarpanch unlawfully removed from office and called out the gender bias in the matter.

He is also credited with directing that one-third of seats in bar associations, including the Supreme Court Bar Association, be reserved for women.

Justice Kant was part of the bench that appointed a five-member committee headed by former top court judge Justice Indu Malhotra to probe the security breach during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Punjab in 2022, saying such matters required“a judicially trained mind”.

He also upheld the One Rank-One Pension scheme for defence forces, calling it constitutionally valid, and continues to hear petitions of women officers in the armed forces seeking parity in permanent commission.

Justice Kant was on the seven-judge bench that overruled the 1967 Aligarh Muslim University judgment, opening the way for reconsideration of the institution's minority status.

He was also part of the bench which heard the Pegasus spyware case and which appointed a panel of cyber experts to probe allegations of unlawful surveillance, famously stating that the state cannot get a "free pass under the guise of national security".

(With PTI inputs)

MENAFN23112025007365015876ID1110384625