
403
Sorry!!
Error! We're sorry, but the page you were looking for doesn't exist.
'Adaptive Regulations Will Always Be Relevant', Says H.E. Maryam Bint Ahmed Al Hammadi At The Annual Meetings Of The Global Future Councils And Cybersecurity 2025
(MENAFN- Mid-East Info)
Sheikha Shamma bint Sultan bin Khalifa Al Nahyan, President and CEO of the UAE Independent Climate Change Accelerators (UICCA), was present at the session, titled 'Regulation: Friend or Foe?', which explored the strategies that can help governments stay ahead of rapid change and make regulatory systems more agile, adaptive, and forward-looking, with Dan Murphy, Anchor and Correspondent for CNBC, moderating the discussion. Focusing on emerging technologies like AI, quantum computing, and synthetic biology, the panel brought H.E. Maryam bint Ahmed Al Hammadi together with Rachel Adams, Founder and CEO of the Global Centre on AI Governance, South Africa; Prof. Hiroki Habuka, Research Professor at Kyoto University's Graduate School of Law in Japan; and Jack Hidary, CEO of SandboxAQ, USA. “Adaptive regulations will always be relevant and will keep trust in your system alive,” H.E. Maryam bint Ahmed Al Hammadi explained, revealing that the UAE strives to ensure regulations are clear, transparent, and adapted by design.“In the UAE, we build flexibility in our legislation system so it can adapt in real time. Emerging technology is moving very fast; it will not wait for our laws and regulation systems to catch up. And that is why we have to plan proactively for it.” “Furthermore, we co-design our regulations with all our stakeholders, including academics, NGOs, businesses, government entities, startups, and others, so that they are part of the ecosystem we are building in the UAE,” Her Excellency added, noting that efforts are also under way to expand this collaborative process globally.“We work with the World Economic Forum on the Global Regulatory Innovation Platform, where we invite all countries to share their practices and experiences to start a dialogue.” For his part, Prof. Hiroki Habuka remarked that it is almost impossible for regulation to capture every detail of fast-moving technology.“In Japan, drafting a law can take two or three years, which is like ten years in the AI industry,” he said, adding that regulations should be more outcome-based and principle-driven rather than rigid and rule-based, where guidelines, standards, and other“soft law” tools can evolve more quickly, ensuring agility and accountability. “It is not the right approach to try to make uniform regulation all over the world,” Prof. Habuka continued.“And that is why the Japanese government strives for interoperability, not the hegemony of certain values.” As the head of a company that is bullish in its adoption of advanced technologies, Jack Hidary said:“Often one of the greatest dangers of a new technology is not that it will be used, but that it will not be used. The old methods meant taking 15 years to develop a potential drug, for example, so I think there is a good sense now that we should focus on outcomes.” “One thing that we recommend building into regulation is the ability to convene because one of the powers of government that is the strongest but most underused is the power of convene,” he added, noting that the UAE is a great model in this regard.“Here, government workers see themselves as entrepreneurs. I think encouraging that is fundamental if we are going to adopt these technologies in a productive way, rather than seeing regulation as control.” On the same topic, Rachel Adams stressed that:“When we speak of AI governance, we need to ask: who needs to be regulated? We don't want to be regulating or putting too large a compliance burden on local small innovators, but we also want to be creating fair markets and ensuring that there isn't dominance of particular players in particular areas.” “My big concern is that the benefits and opportunities of AI are not equally distributed. Law making is slow, deliberately so, so that we have meaningful public participation and deliberation, and so that we think through the various consequences,” she explained, adding that global cooperation is essential because big tech operates across borders.
-
Sheikha Shamma bint Sultan bin Khalifa Al Nahyan attended the session.
-
H.E. Maryam bint Ahmed Al Hammadi took part in a panel discussion on regulations with regards to emerging technologies.
Sheikha Shamma bint Sultan bin Khalifa Al Nahyan, President and CEO of the UAE Independent Climate Change Accelerators (UICCA), was present at the session, titled 'Regulation: Friend or Foe?', which explored the strategies that can help governments stay ahead of rapid change and make regulatory systems more agile, adaptive, and forward-looking, with Dan Murphy, Anchor and Correspondent for CNBC, moderating the discussion. Focusing on emerging technologies like AI, quantum computing, and synthetic biology, the panel brought H.E. Maryam bint Ahmed Al Hammadi together with Rachel Adams, Founder and CEO of the Global Centre on AI Governance, South Africa; Prof. Hiroki Habuka, Research Professor at Kyoto University's Graduate School of Law in Japan; and Jack Hidary, CEO of SandboxAQ, USA. “Adaptive regulations will always be relevant and will keep trust in your system alive,” H.E. Maryam bint Ahmed Al Hammadi explained, revealing that the UAE strives to ensure regulations are clear, transparent, and adapted by design.“In the UAE, we build flexibility in our legislation system so it can adapt in real time. Emerging technology is moving very fast; it will not wait for our laws and regulation systems to catch up. And that is why we have to plan proactively for it.” “Furthermore, we co-design our regulations with all our stakeholders, including academics, NGOs, businesses, government entities, startups, and others, so that they are part of the ecosystem we are building in the UAE,” Her Excellency added, noting that efforts are also under way to expand this collaborative process globally.“We work with the World Economic Forum on the Global Regulatory Innovation Platform, where we invite all countries to share their practices and experiences to start a dialogue.” For his part, Prof. Hiroki Habuka remarked that it is almost impossible for regulation to capture every detail of fast-moving technology.“In Japan, drafting a law can take two or three years, which is like ten years in the AI industry,” he said, adding that regulations should be more outcome-based and principle-driven rather than rigid and rule-based, where guidelines, standards, and other“soft law” tools can evolve more quickly, ensuring agility and accountability. “It is not the right approach to try to make uniform regulation all over the world,” Prof. Habuka continued.“And that is why the Japanese government strives for interoperability, not the hegemony of certain values.” As the head of a company that is bullish in its adoption of advanced technologies, Jack Hidary said:“Often one of the greatest dangers of a new technology is not that it will be used, but that it will not be used. The old methods meant taking 15 years to develop a potential drug, for example, so I think there is a good sense now that we should focus on outcomes.” “One thing that we recommend building into regulation is the ability to convene because one of the powers of government that is the strongest but most underused is the power of convene,” he added, noting that the UAE is a great model in this regard.“Here, government workers see themselves as entrepreneurs. I think encouraging that is fundamental if we are going to adopt these technologies in a productive way, rather than seeing regulation as control.” On the same topic, Rachel Adams stressed that:“When we speak of AI governance, we need to ask: who needs to be regulated? We don't want to be regulating or putting too large a compliance burden on local small innovators, but we also want to be creating fair markets and ensuring that there isn't dominance of particular players in particular areas.” “My big concern is that the benefits and opportunities of AI are not equally distributed. Law making is slow, deliberately so, so that we have meaningful public participation and deliberation, and so that we think through the various consequences,” she explained, adding that global cooperation is essential because big tech operates across borders.

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Most popular stories
Market Research

- Thinkmarkets Adds Synthetic Indices To Its Product Offering
- Ethereum Startup Agoralend Opens Fresh Fundraise After Oversubscribed $300,000 Round.
- KOR Closes Series B Funding To Accelerate Global Growth
- Wise Wolves Corporation Launches Unified Brand To Power The Next Era Of Cross-Border Finance
- Lombard And Story Partner To Revolutionize Creator Economy Via Bitcoin-Backed Infrastructure
- FBS AI Assistant Helps Traders Skip Market Noise And Focus On Strategy
Comments
No comment