MOD Feasibility Study Confirms Robust Capital Intensity And 31%+ IRR Maiden Ore Reserve
| Metric | Unit | First 5 Years of Steady State ( 1) | First 10 Years ( 2 ) | LOM |
| Mining Summary | ||||
| Total Ore Mined | kt | 80,683 | 173,994 | 178,635 |
| Total Waste Mined | kt | 73,803 | 144,778 | 145,889 |
| Strip Ratio | w:o | 0.91x | 0.83x | 0.82x |
| Production Summary | ||||
| Average Annual Ore Sent to Heap Leach | Mtpa | 12.4 | 13.6 | 14.1 |
| Head Grade Cu | % Cu | 0.52% | 0.48% | 0.42% |
| Cu Recovery | % Cu | 77% | 73% | 72% |
| Average Annual Cu Recovered | ktpa Cu | 50 | 48 | 43 |
| Operating Costs | ||||
| Mine Operating Costs | US$/t mined | $1.2 | $1.4 | $1.5 |
| Processing Costs | US$/t processed | $8.9 | $8.9 | $8.8 |
| G&A Costs | US$/t processed | $0.3 | $0.3 | $0.3 |
| Total Operating Costs | US$/t processed | $ 12.3 | $ 12.5 | $ 11.9 |
| Sales & Royalty | US$/lb Cu | $0.10 | $0.07 | $0.06 |
| C1 Cash Costs ( 3 ) | US$/lb Cu | $ 1.45 | $ 1.68 | $ 1.84 |
| AISC(4) | US$/lb Cu | $1.97 | $2.12 | $2.29 |
| Capital Expenditures | ||||
| Initial Capital | US$m | $587 | ||
| Expansion Capital | US$m | $77 | ||
| Sustaining Capital | US$m | $283 | $484 | $529 |
| Closure Cost | US$m | $47 | ||
| Salvage Value | US$m | $43 | ||
| Financial Metrics | ||||
| Long Term Copper Price | US$/lb Cu | $4.30 | ||
| Average Annual EBITDA | US$m | $326 | $288 | $241 |
| Post-Tax Average Annual Unlevered Free Cash Flow(5) | US$m | $222 | $188 | $160 |
| Pre-tax NPV8% | US$m | $900 | ||
| Post-tax NPV8% | US$m | $709 | ||
| Pre-tax IRR | % | 33% | ||
| Post-tax IRR | % | 31% | ||
| Payback Period | years | 2.5 |
Notes: 1. First 5 years of steady state (Years 2-6)
2. First 10 Years production includes material moved for pre-stripping in Year -1 and ramp-up period in Year 1.
3. C1 Cash Costs includes the mining, processing, G&A, marketing & sales, and royalty costs. These are Non-GAAP performance measures.
4. AISC includes sustaining capex, closure capex, and salvage value.
5. Average Annual Unlevered Free Cash Flow during operating years only (years 1-13)
Table 1: Summary of MOD DFS Production Target and Financial Metrics
Initial Capital Cost
The initial capital cost estimate provides for US$587m for 50 ktpa of copper production capacity per annum, with a capital intensity per tonne of production capacity of US$11,700/tonne.
All capital cost estimates have been developed considering the American Association of Cost Engineers (“AACE”) Class 3 guidelines, with an expected accuracy of of -10% to -20% / +10% to +30%. A contingency of 10%, on average, has been applied across the direct and indirect capital costs of the Project.
Capital costs have been developed using material take-offs (“MTOs”) developed by Ausenco in the DFS engineering which included detailed equipment lists and quantities. Equipment, materials, earthworks and construction were then quoted using reputable local and international firms.
The mining fleet is assumed to be financed under a lease to own arrangement. The water and power infrastructure to the mine gate is assumed to be developed by third parties under a Build Own Operate Transfer (“BOOT”) contract structure with large international and local infrastructure firms operating in Chile.
| Metric | Unit | Total LOM |
| Initial Capital Cost | ||
| Mine | US$m | $24 |
| Crushing | US$m | $141 |
| Heap Leach & SX-EW | US$m | $223 |
| Infrastructure | US$m | $49 |
| Total Direct Costs | US$m | $ 437 |
| Indirect costs | US$m | $80 |
| Owner costs | US$m | $17 |
| Contingency | US$m | $53 |
| Total Initial Capital Cost | US$m | $ 587 |
Table 2: Initial Capital Costs for the MOD Project
The estimates for initial capital cost put the MOD among the lowest absolute capital costs and capital intensities for any greenfields copper projects globally. According to Wood Mackenzie's global copper project database, there are seven projects with lower capital intensity in the developer universe with initial capital more than US$300m and production targets of greater than 100Mlbs of copper per annum. The MOD is among the lowest capital intensity and absolute capital cost copper development projects in this dataset.
Figure 1: Capital Cost Intensity for Global Copper Development Projects in Wood Mackenzie Database Highlighting the MOD's Attractive Capital Intensity
Operating Costs
Operating costs were built from first principles using schedules for labour, energy consumption, consumables (diesel, lubricants, reagents, acid, water) and equipment manufacturer specified maintenance schedules over the life of mine.
Mining costs were provided via specialist Chilean mining consultancy NCL and were benchmarked against operations with identical fleets and similar mine production profiles operating in Chile. Mining rates were developed from first principles with industry standard assumptions on utilization rates and adjusted for MOD specific operating parameters using a Mining Cost Adjustment Factor (“MCAF”). This accounts for changes in vertical and lateral haulage distances as the open pit develops over the life of mine. Mining operating costs include interest and capital costs associated with a leasing equipment contract structure with Komatsu.
Processing costs were also developed from first principles utilizing schedules for labour, reagent consumption from the geometallurgical model and metallurgical test work. These were applied using the geometallurgical model to account for acid consumption, and for industry standard rates for the SX-EW facility.
| Total Estimated Operating Costs | LOM Total (US$m) | LOM Average (US$/t processed) | LOM Average (US$/lb Cu) |
| Mining (excl. deferred stripping) | $498 | $2.79 | $0.42 |
| Processing (excl acid) ( 1 ) | $1,037 | $5.80 | $0.87 |
| Acid | $530 | $2.97 | $0.45 |
| G&A | $53 | $0.30 | $0.04 |
| Sub-Total | $ 2,119 | $ 11.86 | $ 1.78 |
| Total C1 Cash Cost ( 2) | $ 1.84 | ||
| Sustaining Capital Cost | $529 | $2.96 | $0.44 |
| AISC ( 3) | $ 2.29 |
Notes: 1. Includes cost for Port and BOOT Agreements.
2. C1 Cash Costs includes transport, selling and royalty costs in addition to the sub-total presented. These are Non-GAAP performance measures.
3. AISC includes sustaining capex, closure capex, and salvage value.
Table 3: Total Operating Costs Estimate
The Company has benchmarked the MOD utilizing Wood Mackenzie's database of 237 operating copper mines. Several of the mines have negative C1 and AISC costs on account of by-product credits. These have been included for completeness of the analysis .
The MOD has projected C1 cash costs for the first five years of steady state operations are US$1.45/lb. For the first 10yrs of operations, including the ramp up period in year 1, C1 cash costs are projected to be US$1.68/lb.
This places the MOD at the bottom end and middle of the 2nd quartile of the peer group for these periods, respectively, when compared to the benchmarked universe of copper assets, per Wood Mackenzie.
Figure 2: C1 Cash Cost Curve for Operating Copper Mines from Wood Mackenzie Showing Competitive MOD C1 Cost Base in 2 nd Quartile
On an AISC cost basis, the Project has projected costs of US$1.97/lb for the first 5yrs of steady state operation and US$2.09/lb during steady state operations (years 2-10). For the first 10yrs of operations, including the ramp up period in year 1, AISC costs are projected to be US$2.12/lb.
This places the MOD in the bottom of the 2nd quartile during steady state operations (including ramp-up) when compared to the peer group of benchmarked copper assets per Wood Mackenzie.
Figure 3: AISC Cost Curve for Operating Copper Mines with MOD Steady-State AISC in 2 nd Quartile
Economic Analysis
The Company has completed sensitivity analysis using a range of copper prices, underlying input cost assumptions and discount rates to stress-test the business case and identify key areas of risk to the business plan.
Similar to many mining projects, the MOD's ROIC is quite sensitive to underlying copper price assumptions, with an IRR of 31% and NPV8% of US$709m based on a flat pricing assumption of US$4.30/lb Cu, which is just below the current long term (“LT”) consensus copper price of US$4.36/lb. At the trailing 3-month COMEX copper price of US$5.05/lb, the Project delivers an exceptional NPV8 (post tax) of with an IRR of 39%.
In contrast to most of the peer group of development assets, the Project delivers robust economics even when assuming copper prices well below the LT consensus price. The MOD delivers robust cashflow generation and Return on Invested Capital (“ROIC”) metrics for any reasonable assumption of downside copper price assumptions.
Marimaca has analyzed the Wood Mackenzie AISC cost curve for copper producers, which indicates the 75th percentile of the universe of 237 operational copper assets starts at an AISC of US$3.00/lb, and the 85th percentile at approximately US$3.50/lb. Using a flat US$3.50/lb LT flat copper price assumption, the MOD delivers a post-tax NPV8 of US$347m and an IRR of 21% with a payback period of just over 3 years. Given the long-term demand forecasts for copper, the company believes this is a reasonable downside price assessment on which to stress project economics.
Among Wood Mackenzie's database of 83 development stage copper assets with publicly available technical studies, the MOD has a profitability index (Pre-Tax NPV / Initial Capital Cost) in the top quartile of the peer universe. When combined with its outstanding geographical location, in a recognized and mature mining jurisdiction, the MOD clearly benchmarks as an exceptional project from a financial risk perspective.
Figure 4: Profitability Index for Global Copper Projects in Wood Mackenzie Database Indicating the Superior Return on Capital of the MOD
In summary, the MOD is a financially robust asset, which generates superior returns when benchmarked against the majority of development and producer peers. As a result, the Company expects the project to be financeable via traditional debt and equity structures, and to generate strong returns for investors.
The Company will now turn its attention to the next phase of development activities, continuing to move the project towards production. Marimaca is formulating a development plan which will encompass further grade control drilling, additional confirmatory and optimization metallurgical test work, detailed design and engineering, early site preparation works (to commence on receipt of environmental approvals) and deposits on long lead items. The Company will also continue to progress its growth development strategy for the Pampa Medina and Madrugador oxide deposits and its parallel exploration strategy to unlock further value in its extensive exploration portfolio.
At the end of June 2025, the Company had over US$24m in cash available, which is sufficient to finance its ongoing development activities.
Funding
The debt financing process has commenced, with debt advisors and Independent Technical Experts (“ITE”) engaged and reviewing the DFS in preparation for formal launch of a broad debt process to support project development. Marimaca has completed an initial outreach program to various debt providers with expressions of interest of up to US$500m based on initial, pre-DFS, financial models prepared by the Company. The indicative feedback received from these groups suggests the MOD is debt financeable. The Company's aim is to identify its preferred debt partners and to announce credit approved term sheets, subject to long form documentation, towards the end of 2025.
The Company has several large shareholders on its register including two strategic investors in Assore International Holdings (“Assore”) and Mitsubishi Corp (“Mitsubishi”). Both Assore and Mitsubishi have significant equity financing capacity and have indicated their ongoing support to the Marimaca team and development of the Project. The Company believes, on this basis, that equity financing of the MOD is achievable in combination with a broader capital raise from institutional and sophisticated investors.
Next Steps & Pre-Final Investment Decision Work Programs
Following the endorsement of the DFS by the Board of Marimaca, the Company will commence various early works activities which will include detailed design and engineering, grade control drilling, further optimization metallurgical programs, deposits on key equipment and acquisition of vendor engineer as well as site preparation works including construction of access roads and buildings. The DFS assumes these items are completed ahead of Final Investment Decision (“FID”) to achieve appropriate project maturity before FID.
Marimaca has cash on its balance sheet of over US$24m, which is sufficient to fund the commencement of these work items. The Company is dual listed on the Australian Stock Exchange (“ASX”) and the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”), which provides it with access to a broad pool of specialist and generalist mining investors to further de-risk the eventual equity capital requirements for project development.
The Company is currently exploring strategic alternatives to the development of the Project, including engagement with strategic mining companies and copper producers, traders and offtakers, and other alternative financing sources.
Qualified/Competent Person
The independent Competent Persons (“CP”), as defined under JORC, and Qualified Persons (“QP”), as defined by NI 43-101 for this Press Release are defined below.
The statements in this Press Release relating to processing, costing, economics is Tommaso Roberto Raponi. Mr. Tommaso Roberto Raponi is a Professional Engineer registered with the Professional Engineers Ontario, Engineers and Geoscientists British Columbia, and NWT and Nunavut Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists. Mr. Raponi is a Principal Metallurgist with Ausenco Engineering Canada ULC, with an office address in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Mr. Raponi is responsible for the processing, costing, economics aspects of the MOD DFS Report as a QP/CP. Mr. Raponi has sufficient experience relevant to the style of project consideration and to the activity he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as such term is defined in the JORC Code (2012 edition) and a Qualified Person (as such term is defined in NI 43-101). The CP, Mr. Raponi, has read and verified the MOD DFS Press Release for matters related to processing, costing, economics based on the information he prepared for the DFS and in which they appear in the form and context.
The statements relating in this Press Release that relates to drilling, modelling and Mineral Resources estimation is based on and fairly represents information compiled by NCL Ingeniería y Construcción SpA. and reviewed by Luis Oviedo, P. Geo, an independent Consulting Geologist with more than 45 years of experience. Mr. Oviedo is a member of the Colegio de Geólogos and the Institute of Mining Engineers of Chile and takes responsibility for the Mineral Resource aspects of the MOD DFS Press Release as a CP. Mr. Oviedo has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration, and to the activity he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as such term is defined in the JORC Code (2012 edition) and a Qualified Person (as such term is defined in NI 43-101). Mr. Oviedo has read and verified the MOD DFS Press Release for matters related to drilling, modelling and Mineral Resources based on the information he prepared for the DFS and in which they appear in the form and context. The Effective Date of the Mineral Resource Estimate is August 25, 2025
The statements relating in this Press Release that relates to Ore Reserves and the Mining section presented in the Appendix 1 is based on information prepared by and mine planning work by NCL Ingeniería y Construcción SpA. and reviewed by Carlos Guzmán RM CMC, FAusIMM. Mr. Guzman is a mining engineer and Principal Director at NCL Ingeniería y Construcción SpA., a consulting firm based in Santiago, Chile. Mr. Guzman has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as such term is defined in the JORC Code (2012 edition) and a Qualified Person (as such term is defined in NI 43-101). ). Mr. Oviedo has read and verified the MOD DFS Press Release for matters related to Ore Reserves and Mining based on the information he prepared for the DFS and in which they appear in the form and context. The Effective Date of the Mineral Reserve Estimate is August 25, 2025.
Mr. Scott C. Elfen is a Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California and in the State of Idaho. Mr. Elfen is the Global Lead of Geotechnical and Civil Services at Ausenco Engineering Canada ULC, with an office address in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Mr. Elfen is responsible for the Process Plant Geotechnical information presented in the Appendix 1 of the MOD DFS Report as a CP. Mr. Elfen has sufficient experience relevant to the style of project consideration and to the activity he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as such term is defined in the JORC Code (2012 edition) and a Qualified Person (as such term is defined in NI 43-101). The CP, Mr. Elfen, has read and verified the MOD DFS Press Release for matters related to Process Plant Geotechnical information based on the information he prepared for the DFS and in which they appear in the form and context.
Mr. James Millardis a professional geologist (P. Geo.) and member in good standing of the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Nova Scotia. Mr. Millard is a professional geologist and Director, Strategic Projects at Ausenco Sustainability ULC, with an office address in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada. Mr. Millard is responsible for the Environmental, Social and Community aspects presented in Appendix 1 of the MOD DFS Report as a CP. Mr. Millard has sufficient experience relevant to the activity he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as such term is defined in the JORC Code (2012 edition) and a Qualified Person (as such term is defined in NI 43-101). Mr. Millard has read and verified the MOD DFS Press Release for matters related to Environmental, Social and Community aspects based on the information he prepared for the DFS and in which they appear in the form and context.
National Instrument 43-101
An independent technical report for the DFS prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 will be available under the Company's SEDAR+ profile and website within 45 days of this announcement.
Contact Information
For further information, please visit or contact:
Tavistock
+44 (0) 207 920 3150
Emily Moss / Ruairi Millar
...
Figures accompanying this announcement are available at:

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.





Comments
No comment