'Vote Chori': EC Asks Rahul Gandhi To Sign Oath. What If He Doesn't?
As per the CEO's letter, Gandhi will have to give a declaration that the statement made by him, under rule 20 of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, is true to the best of his knowledge, and he is aware that making a false declaration in connection with electoral rolls is punishable under section 31 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950.
Also Read | 'Saza zaroor milegi': Rahul Gandhi intensifies 'Vote Chori' salvo at EC, govtBut what if Rahul Gandhi doesn't sign this declaration/oath?
Sources in the Election Commission of India (ECI) said that Gandhi either has to sign the declaration or apologise for his "absurd" allegations.
"If Rahul Gandhi believes in his analysis and believes that his allegations against ECI are true, he should have no problem in signing the Declaration," sources told news agency ANI.
"If Rahul Gandhi does not sign the Declaration, it would mean that he does not believe in his analysis and resultant conclusions and absurd allegations. In which case, he should apologise to the nation," sources added.
Also Read | Shashi Tharoor on Rahul Gandhi's 'vote chori' charges: 'ECI must urgently act'"Therefore, he has two options: Either sign the Declaration or apologise to the Nation for raising absurd allegations against ECI " Election Commission's sources said.
Rahul Gandhi's reply to ECSpeaking in Bnegaluru on Friday, Rahul Gandhi said,“The Election Commission demands an affidavit from me. It says that I must take an oath. I have already taken the oath of the Constitution in Parliament."
Also Read | Rahul responds to EC's affidavit demand: 'Taken oath of Constitution'In a press conference on Thursday, Gandhi claimed there was "vote chori" of 1,00,250 votes in a Karnataka constituency, with 11,965 duplicate voters in the segment, 40,009 voters with fake and invalid addresses, 10,452 bulk voters or single address voters, 4,132 voters with invalid photos and 33,692 voters misusing Form 6 of new voters.
Gandhi said what his party had collected through research was "criminal evidence" and alleged that the Election Commission was busy destroying such proof across the country.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Comments
No comment