Globally, leaders from Italy, Germany and France rebutted Trump's assertion that the Paris Agreement could be renegotiated . Others from Japan , Canada, Australia and New Zealand doubled down on their own support of the global climate accord. In 2020, President Joe Biden brought the US back into the agreement.

Now, with Trump pulling the US out again – and taking steps to eliminate US climate policies , boost fossil fuels and slow the growth of clean energy at home – other countries are stepping up.

On July 24, 2025, China and the European Union issued a joint statement vowing to strengthen their climate targets and meet them. They alluded to the US, referring to“the fluid and turbulent international situation today” in saying that“the major economies ... must step up efforts to address climate change.”

In some respects, this is a strength of the Paris Agreement – it is a legally nonbinding agreement based on what each country decides to commit to. Its flexibility keeps it alive, as the withdrawal of a single member does not trigger immediate sanctions, nor does it render the actions of others obsolete.

The agreement survived the first US withdrawal, and so far, all signs point to it surviving the second one.

From what I've seen in international climate meetings and my team's research , it appears that most countries are moving forward. One bloc emerging as a powerful voice in negotiations is the Like-Minded Group of Developing Countries – a group of low- and middle-income countries that includes China, India, Bolivia and Venezuela.

Driven by economic development concerns, these countries are pressuring the developed world to meet its commitments to both cut emissions and provide financial aid to poorer countries.

China, motivated by economic and political factors, seems to be happily filling the climate power vacuum created by the US exit.

In 2017, China voiced disappointment over the first US withdrawal. It maintained its climate commitments and pledged to contribute more in climate finance to other developing countries than the US had committed to – US$3.1 billion compared with $3 billion.

This time around, China is using its leadership on climate change in ways that fit its broader strategy of gaining influence and economic power by supporting economic growth and cooperation in developing countries.

Through its Belt and Road Initiative , China has scaled up renewable energy exports and development in other countries, such as investing in solar power in Egypt and wind energy development in Ethiopia .

While China is still the world's largest coal consumer , it has aggressively pursued investments in renewable energy at home, including solar, wind and electrification. In 2024, about half the renewable energy capacity built worldwide was in China.

While it missed the deadline to submit its climate pledge due this year, China has a goal of peaking its emissions before 2030 and then dropping to net-zero emissions by 2060. It is continuing major investments in renewable energy , both for its own use and for export.

The US government, in contrast, is cutting its support for wind and solar power. China also just expanded its carbon market to encourage emissions cuts in the cement, steel and aluminum sectors.

The British government has also ratcheted up its climate commitments as it seeks to become a clean energy superpower . In 2025, it pledged to cut emissions 77% by 2035 compared with 1990 levels.

Sign up for one of our free newsletters

• The Daily Report Start your day right with Asia Times' top stories
• AT Weekly Report A weekly roundup of Asia Times' most-read stories

Its new pledge is also more transparent and specific than in the past, with details on how specific sectors, such as power, transportation, construction and agriculture, will cut emissions. And it contains stronger commitments to provide funding to help developing countries grow more sustainably.

In terms of corporate leadership, while many American businesses are being quieter about their efforts, in order to avoid sparking the ire of the Trump administration, most appear to be continuing on a green path – despite the lack of federal support and diminished rules.

USA Today and Statista's“America's Climate Leader List” includes about 500 large companies that have reduced their carbon intensity – carbon emissions divided by revenue – by 3% from the previous year. The data shows that the list is growing, up from about 400 in 2023.

2025 climate talks

The Paris Agreement isn't going anywhere. Given the agreement's design, with each country voluntarily setting its own goals, the US never had the power to drive it into obsolescence.

The question is whether developed and developing country leaders alike can navigate two pressing needs – economic growth and ecological sustainability – without compromising their leadership on climate change.

This year's UN climate conference in Brazil, COP30 , will show how countries intend to move forward and, importantly, who will lead the way.

Shannon Gibson is professor of environmental studies, political science and international relations, USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences

Research assistant Emerson Damiano, a recent graduate in environmental studies at USC, contributed to this article.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article .

Sign up here to comment on Asia Times stories Or Sign in to an existing accoun

Thank you for registering!

An account was already registered with this email. Please check your inbox for an authentication link.

• Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
• Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
• Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
• Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
• Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
• Click to print (Opens in new window) Print