Court Halts Trump’s Ending Birthright Citizenship Bid
(MENAFN) A U.S. federal appeals court took decisive action on Wednesday by halting President Donald Trump’s executive directive aimed at eliminating birthright citizenship.
The court determined the order is “very likely unconstitutional” and ruled it cannot be implemented while ongoing legal proceedings continue.
In a 2–1 ruling, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals supported an earlier court decision and upheld a nationwide block on the directive, which had been scheduled to take effect on July 27.
The ruling ensures the executive action remains unenforceable for the time being.
Four states—Washington, Arizona, Illinois, and Oregon—filed the legal challenge, contending that the policy would decrease population figures and ultimately lead to cuts in federal funding.
“The district court correctly concluded that the Executive Order’s proposed interpretation, denying citizenship to many persons born in the United States, is unconstitutional. We fully agree,” the court’s majority stated in its written opinion.
In a separate case, another federal judge had also prohibited the implementation of the order, extending protection to a nationwide group that included all infants born in the country to noncitizen parents.
Trump issued the executive order in January in an attempt to reinterpret the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment.
His intention was to stop the automatic provision of U.S. citizenship to children born on American soil to undocumented immigrants or those with temporary legal status.
The court determined the order is “very likely unconstitutional” and ruled it cannot be implemented while ongoing legal proceedings continue.
In a 2–1 ruling, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals supported an earlier court decision and upheld a nationwide block on the directive, which had been scheduled to take effect on July 27.
The ruling ensures the executive action remains unenforceable for the time being.
Four states—Washington, Arizona, Illinois, and Oregon—filed the legal challenge, contending that the policy would decrease population figures and ultimately lead to cuts in federal funding.
“The district court correctly concluded that the Executive Order’s proposed interpretation, denying citizenship to many persons born in the United States, is unconstitutional. We fully agree,” the court’s majority stated in its written opinion.
In a separate case, another federal judge had also prohibited the implementation of the order, extending protection to a nationwide group that included all infants born in the country to noncitizen parents.
Trump issued the executive order in January in an attempt to reinterpret the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment.
His intention was to stop the automatic provision of U.S. citizenship to children born on American soil to undocumented immigrants or those with temporary legal status.

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Most popular stories
Market Research

- Origin Summit Debuts In Seoul During KBW As Flagship Gathering On IP, AI, And The Next Era Of Blockchain-Enabled Real-World Assets
- What Are The Latest Trends In The Europe Steel Market For 2025?
- United States AI Governance Market Size, Demand, Growth & Outlook 2033
- NOVA Collective Invest Showcases Intelligent Trading System7.0 Iterations Led By Brady Rodriguez
- North America Perms And Relaxants Market Size, Share And Growth Report 2025-2033
- Canada Real Estate Market Size, Share, Trends & Growth Opportunities 2033
Comments
No comment