403
Sorry!!
Error! We're sorry, but the page you were
looking for doesn't exist.
U.S. Veto On Gripen E Fighter Jets Shakes Latin American Defense Plans
(MENAFN- The Rio Times) The United States recently blocked the sale of Saab's Gripen E fighter jets to Colombia, citing restrictions on the export of the General Electric F414-GE-39E engine, a critical component of the aircraft.
This decision, first reported by defense analysts and later confirmed by multiple sources, underscores Washington's strategic control over military technology exports and its influence on regional defense policies.
The veto has left Colombia scrambling for alternatives and raised concerns about similar restrictions affecting Peru, which is also evaluating the Gripen E as part of its air force modernization efforts.
Colombia had been negotiating a deal worth approximately €3 billion (around $3.2 billion) to replace its aging fleet of Kfir fighter jets with the Gripen E. The Swedish aircraft was favored for its advanced technology, cost-effectiveness, and ability to patrol large territories without refueling.
Saab had also proposed partnerships to boost local industry, making the Gripen an attractive option. However, the U.S. veto on the engine export effectively halted these plans, forcing Colombia to reconsider its options.
This move aligns with broader U.S. foreign policy objectives to maintain dominance in the global arms trade. It also aims to limit the spread of sensitive military technology.
By blocking the sale, Washington is also promoting American alternatives like Lockheed Martin's F-16 Block 70, which offers proven capabilities but comes with higher operational costs and dependency on U.S.-based maintenance and parts.
Implications of U.S. Veto on Defense Procurement
The decision has broader implications for Latin America's defense landscape. Peru, which is seeking to replace its aging Mirage 2000s and MiG-29s, now faces uncertainty regarding its potential acquisition of the Gripen E.
The U.S. veto could push Lima toward other options, such as France's Dassault Rafale or China's J-10C. While the Rafale offers high performance without U.S.-made components, its cost is significantly higher. Meanwhile, opting for Chinese aircraft could strain Peru's relations with Washington.
The veto also risks straining Colombia's long-standing military ties with the U.S., built over decades through initiatives like Plan Colombia. Some analysts speculate that Bogotá may pivot toward non-Western suppliers like China if U.S. restrictions persist.
This development highlights Washington's leverage in shaping defense procurement across Latin America. It also raises questions about regional autonomy in military modernization efforts.
This decision, first reported by defense analysts and later confirmed by multiple sources, underscores Washington's strategic control over military technology exports and its influence on regional defense policies.
The veto has left Colombia scrambling for alternatives and raised concerns about similar restrictions affecting Peru, which is also evaluating the Gripen E as part of its air force modernization efforts.
Colombia had been negotiating a deal worth approximately €3 billion (around $3.2 billion) to replace its aging fleet of Kfir fighter jets with the Gripen E. The Swedish aircraft was favored for its advanced technology, cost-effectiveness, and ability to patrol large territories without refueling.
Saab had also proposed partnerships to boost local industry, making the Gripen an attractive option. However, the U.S. veto on the engine export effectively halted these plans, forcing Colombia to reconsider its options.
This move aligns with broader U.S. foreign policy objectives to maintain dominance in the global arms trade. It also aims to limit the spread of sensitive military technology.
By blocking the sale, Washington is also promoting American alternatives like Lockheed Martin's F-16 Block 70, which offers proven capabilities but comes with higher operational costs and dependency on U.S.-based maintenance and parts.
Implications of U.S. Veto on Defense Procurement
The decision has broader implications for Latin America's defense landscape. Peru, which is seeking to replace its aging Mirage 2000s and MiG-29s, now faces uncertainty regarding its potential acquisition of the Gripen E.
The U.S. veto could push Lima toward other options, such as France's Dassault Rafale or China's J-10C. While the Rafale offers high performance without U.S.-made components, its cost is significantly higher. Meanwhile, opting for Chinese aircraft could strain Peru's relations with Washington.
The veto also risks straining Colombia's long-standing military ties with the U.S., built over decades through initiatives like Plan Colombia. Some analysts speculate that Bogotá may pivot toward non-Western suppliers like China if U.S. restrictions persist.
This development highlights Washington's leverage in shaping defense procurement across Latin America. It also raises questions about regional autonomy in military modernization efforts.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Comments
No comment