Dark Eagle: US Bears Hypersonic Claws At China, Russia

The US Army's push for LRPF capabilities, notably hypersonic weapons, is driven by the need to counter adversaries like China and Russia, who have developed advanced anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) systems. These capabilities allow for standoff strikes beyond the range of these systems.

In the Pacific, Asia Times has reported that the US is building a missile wal across the Pacific to counter China's military rise, focusing on LRPF from land-based missile systems like the Typhon.

Capable of launching Tomahawk and SM-6 missiles with ranges from 500 to 1,800 kilometers, the Typhon bridges a gap between the shorter-range Precision Strike Missile (482 kilometers) and the Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon (2,776 kilometers).

The initiative seeks to establish a network of missile launch sites in the First Island Chain, encompassing Japan, Taiwan, and the Philippines, to reinforce counter-A2/AD capabilities vis-à-vis China.

However, the plan faces significant hurdles, particularly ally resistance to hosting US missile systems. While Japan appears most willing, other nations, including the Philippines, Thailand and South Korea, are wary of possible political backlash and economic retaliation from China.

Despite these challenges, the US has begun stationing Typhon launchers in the Philippines, albeit under the guise of training exercises, to avoid triggering regional escalations. This approach reflects a shift toward a“lily pad” strategy of rotational, scalable force deployments rather than fixed bases.

Critics argue the initiative risks destabilizing the Pacific by provoking a missile arms race with China, whose formidable missile arsenal, including the DF-26“Guam Killer,” underscores the growing intensity of the US-China strategic rivalry.

Apart from building a Pacific missile wall, Asia Times mentioned this month that the US Navy is transforming the USS Zumwalt, a US$4 billion guided-missile destroyer, into a hypersonic weapon platform to counter China's growing naval capabilities.

The ship is being retrofitted with missile tubes to replace its inactive gun system, enabling it to launch hypersonic glide vehicles (HGV) at seven to eight times the speed of sound.

This modernization effort, part of the US Navy's Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) program developed with the US Army, aims to enhance the Zumwalt's operational utility by allowing fast, precision strikes from greater distances.

The initiative reflects the urgent need to address rising threats from China's Type 055 cruisers and Russia's tactical nuclear-armed vessels. Despite Zumwalt's advanced technologies, including electric propulsion and stealth design, the class has faced criticism for its high costs and potential vulnerabilities.

The US Navy plans to test the hypersonic system aboard the Zumwalt by 2027 or 2028. The move is part of a broader strategy to maintain naval superiority amid delays and cost overruns in other programs.

However, a US Congressional Research Service (CRS) report this month mentions several critical challenges for the US in developing, producing, testing and deploying hypersonic weapons.

According to the report, one significant hurdle is technological complexity as hypersonic systems require cutting-edge materials that can withstand extreme temperatures and pressures. Manufacturing these advanced materials at scale poses production bottlenecks.

The CRS report states that the precision required for aerodynamic shaping and integrating guidance, navigation and control systems represent further complications.

Sign up for one of our free newsletters

• The Daily Report Start your day right with Asia Times' top stories
• AT Weekly Report A weekly roundup of Asia Times' most-read stories

Additionally, it mentions that testing constraints have hindered progress. Hypersonic flight tests are costly, logistically complex, and limited by the availability of specialized test ranges and facilities. This bottleneck restricts the pace of development and the ability to iterate designs.

Further, the CRS report says these weapons must be integrated into existing military infrastructure, requiring storage, handling, and launch system modifications. It points out that delays in these areas have pushed back deployment timelines further.

The report also mentions that budgetary and bureaucratic hurdles have compounded the technical and logistical challenges, as funding approvals and interagency coordination have caused slow decision-making. Collectively, these factors create a protracted timeline for the operational deployment of US hypersonic capabilities.

In contrast to the US, Josh Luckenbaugh mentions in a July 2024 article for National Defense Magazine that China's lead in hypersonic weapons development is due to its focused investment over the past two decades in infrastructure for developing and testing these systems.

Luckenbaugh highlights China's extensive research and development infrastructure, including numerous wind tunnels dedicated to hypersonic systems. He contrasts this by noting that US facilities and expertise have degraded since the Cold War, with most testing capabilities now in academia.

While Luckenbaugh mentions efforts are underway to rebuild this expertise through collaborations between academia and the US Department of Defense (DOD), the US, to date, has yet to deploy a single hypersonic weapon.

Sign up here to comment on Asia Times stories Or Sign in to an existing accoun

Thank you for registering!

An account was already registered with this email. Please check your inbox for an authentication link.

• Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
• Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
• Click to print (Opens in new window)