Property Tax Sunset: Texas Lawmakers Push Plan To Phase Out School Taxes - Here's What Homeowners Need To Know

(MENAFN- Saving Advice) Texas homeowners are watching closely as lawmakers push a bold plan to phase out Texas school property taxes, a move that could permanently reshape how the state funds public education. For longtime residents, this proposal represents both a massive financial opportunity and a major shift in how local budgets operate.

School taxes make up the largest portion of most Texans' property tax bills, so eliminating them would dramatically reduce annual housing costs. But the plan also raises big questions about replacement revenue, timelines, and what homeowners should expect in the coming years. Here's what you need to know.

The Proposal Aims to Eliminate School Maintenance & Operations Taxes

Texas school property taxes currently fund the day‐to‐day operations of public schools, including salaries, transportation, and classroom resources. Lawmakers are proposing a phased elimination of the M&O portion, which is the largest part of the school tax bill. Supporters argue that removing this tax would give homeowners long‐term relief and make housing more affordable.

Critics warn that the state must identify a stable replacement revenue source to avoid harming school budgets. This debate is at the center of the push to end Texas school property taxes.

Lawmakers Plan to Replace Lost Revenue With State‐Level Funding

To eliminate Texas school property taxes, legislators are exploring alternative funding streams such as sales tax adjustments, consumption‐based taxes, or redirecting existing state surpluses. The goal is to shift school funding away from local property owners and toward broader statewide revenue sources.

Supporters say this approach would create a more predictable and equitable funding model. Opponents worry that relying on volatile revenue sources could lead to budget shortfalls during economic downturns. Homeowners should watch how lawmakers structure these replacement mechanisms.

The Phase‐Out Would Happen Gradually, Not Overnight

Even if the plan passes, Texas school property taxes would not disappear immediately. Lawmakers are discussing a multi‐year phase‐out to give school districts time to adjust and to ensure replacement funding is stable. This gradual approach also helps homeowners plan for future tax reductions rather than expecting sudden changes.

A phased timeline reduces the risk of disrupting school operations or creating budget gaps. Homeowners should expect a multi‐step rollout rather than a single sweeping change.

Homeowners Could See Significant Long‐Term Savings

School M&O taxes often make up more than half of a homeowner's total property tax bill. Eliminating them could save many Texans thousands of dollars per year, especially those in high‐growth counties. These savings would be particularly meaningful for retirees, fixed‐income households, and longtime homeowners facing rising assessments.

Lower annual costs could also make it easier for younger families to enter the housing market. This potential for major savings is a key reason the push to end Texas school property taxes is gaining momentum.

School Districts Are Concerned About Funding Stability

While homeowners may welcome tax relief, school districts are raising concerns about long‐term financial stability. District leaders want assurances that state‐level funding will be reliable, predictable, and protected from political shifts. Many districts rely heavily on property taxes because they provide consistent revenue year after year.

Without strong safeguards, schools fear they could face budget cuts or hiring freezes. These concerns are shaping the legislative debate around Texas school property taxes.

The Plan Could Affect Home Values and Local Budgets

Lower property taxes often make homeownership more attractive, which can increase demand and potentially raise home values. However, the impact will vary depending on how the state replaces school funding. If replacement revenue sources strain local budgets or reduce services, some communities could see mixed effects.

Homeowners should also consider how changes to school funding might influence neighborhood desirability. The connection between schools and property values makes this Texas school property taxes proposal especially complex.

Renters May Also Feel the Impact

Although renters don't pay property taxes directly, landlords typically factor taxes into rental pricing. If Texas school property taxes are phased out, some landlords may pass savings along through slower rent increases.

However, this depends on market conditions, local demand, and how quickly tax reductions take effect. Renters should still pay attention to the proposal because it affects overall housing affordability. The ripple effects could influence rental markets across the state.

Homeowners Should Prepare for Legislative Updates

The proposal to eliminate Texas school property taxes is still evolving, and lawmakers are expected to refine details throughout the year. Homeowners should follow committee hearings, fiscal notes, and public statements from state leaders. Changes to the plan could affect timelines, revenue sources, and eligibility for future tax reductions. Staying informed will help you anticipate how your tax bill may change. With such a major policy shift on the table, updates will likely come quickly.

The effort to eliminate Texas school property taxes represents a historic shift in how the state funds education and how homeowners manage long‐term housing costs. While the potential savings are substantial, the proposal also raises important questions about school funding stability and statewide revenue changes. Homeowners who stay informed will be better prepared to understand how the phase‐out affects their budgets, their communities, and their property values.

Do you support the plan to phase out Texas school property taxes, or are you concerned about the impact on school funding? Share your thoughts in the comments.

MENAFN26022026008491017816ID1110796952