Climate Sham: China Has To Get Real, Quit Coal And Pay Up
Instead, Beijing declined to contribute, citing the principle of“common but differentiated responsibilities.” In plain terms, China argued that developed nations should lead on climate finance, while developing countries like itself focus on domestic emissions reduction.
This reasoning, rooted in the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, is increasingly outdated. The global context has shifted dramatically since then-and so has China. While Beijing insists on its developing-country status, its emissions, economic might and technological leadership tell a more complex story.
China today accounts for nearly 30% of global CO2 emissions-more than the United States, the European Union and India combined. It is both the largest polluter and the largest investor in renewables, building more solar capacity than the rest of the world combined.
Its emissions may have plateaued in recent months, but the country's heavy reliance on coal and its approval of 243 gigawatts of new coal-fired capacity show that peak carbon remains elusive.
At the same time, China's per capita income remains far below that of advanced economies, roughly one-sixth of the US level, giving Beijing grounds to claim it is still“developing.” Yet development is no longer measured by income alone.
Latest stories
Japan's railgun locked and loaded to kill China's hypersonics

Japan and China continue to spar over Takaichi's Taiwan remarks
In infrastructure, technology, industrial capacity and global influence, China is already among the most advanced nations on Earth. China can't hide behind a decades-old classification to avoid shouldering fair responsibility for the planet.
The Climate Action Tracker rates China's policies and targets as“highly insufficient,” warning that current commitments are aligned with a world warming by up to 4°C. Despite recent progress, including a record expansion of renewables and the world's largest emissions trading system, Beijing's long-term goal of reaching net zero by 2060 is still rated“poor” in scope and clarity.
Moreover, as global negotiations move toward setting a new post-2025 climate finance target, expectations for major economies like China to play a stronger role are growing louder, especially from vulnerable countries already paying the price for inaction.
Under the Baku-to-Belem roadmap, countries are working toward finalizing the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) on climate finance, expected to reach around US$300 billion annually from developed nations.
But for this new goal to carry real weight and legitimacy, China and other high-emitting emerging economies will eventually need to be part of the equation -not only as beneficiaries but also as contributors to global climate finance efforts.
To be clear, China is not absent from global climate finance. Research by the World Resources Institute shows that between 2013 and 2022, China provided roughly $45 billion in climate finance to other developing countries, about 6% of the total provided by developed nations. Much of this funding came through bilateral channels and export credits, often linked to infrastructure projects.
However, this support, while notable, is still far below China's global economic and emissions footprint. Recent data from the Lowy Institute's Aid Map shows that China now accounts for about 14% of total climate finance in Southeast Asia and the Pacific, though most of it is directed toward large hydropower and energy infrastructure projects with limited concessionality.
In Southeast Asia, a mere 9% of China's climate finance comes as grants or concessional loans, whereas traditional partners provide over 60% in these more favorable forms.

Sign up for one of our free newsletters
-
The Daily Report
Start your day right with Asia Times' top stories
AT Weekly Report
A weekly roundup of Asia Times' most-read stories
China's refusal to fund the Brazilian rainforest mechanism is therefore less about capacity and more about politics. By clinging to its“developing” label, China positions itself as the leader of the Global South and a counterweight to Western-dominated institutions. But climate change recognizes no geopolitical blocs, and the emissions destabilizing our planet come increasingly from China's coal-heavy economy.
If China truly wishes to lead the developing world, it should do so by example, not by exception. Contributing to global funds like the TFFF would demonstrate that Beijing's climate leadership extends beyond domestic action to global solidarity. It would also lend moral weight to its calls for developed countries to scale up their own finance commitments.
The question is no longer whether China is a developing country. The question is whether a nation responsible for nearly a third of global emissions-and one that has achieved unparalleled industrial success -can continue to use that status as an excuse to shirk responsibility.
Climate justice today demands a new equation: Those with the greatest emissions and the greatest means must contribute the most. China has achieved prosperity. Now it must match that prosperity with greater climate responsibility.
Jawad Khalid is a climate finance specialist focused on green innovation and climate-smart investments based in Islamabad, Pakistan.
Thank you for registering!
An account was already registered with this email. Please check your inbox for an authentication link.
-
Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
LinkedI
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Faceboo
Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
WhatsAp
Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
Reddi
Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
Emai
Click to print (Opens in new window)
Prin
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Comments
No comment