US Defense Chief: Americans Led Majority Of Afghanistan War Effort

U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth sparked backlash after downplaying NATO allies' contributions to the war in Afghanistan during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Wednesday, June 11. He asserted that“the vast majority of the effort was American,” minimizing the significance of international support in the two-decade-long conflict.

NBC News reported that Hegseth's remarks drew immediate criticism from lawmakers, particularly Democratic Senator Chris Coons of Connecticut. Coons emphasized the sacrifices of smaller allied nations, such as Denmark, which endured high casualty rates despite limited military capacity.“To suggest that their losses were less meaningful is simply wrong,” Coons stated.

While Hegseth acknowledged the sacrifices made by coalition partners, he insisted that the United States bore the primary burden of the war.“We appreciate those contributions,” he said,“but the core of the mission was carried out by U.S. forces.”

A total of 32 countries participated in the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) mission in Afghanistan. According to the U.K. Ministry of Defence, Britain lost 457 soldiers - the second-highest toll after the United States. Canada, Germany, and Italy also sustained notable casualties.

Critics argue that undermining allies' roles damages trust and weakens future multilateral military collaborations. Former NATO commander Gen. Wesley Clark told PBS,“Solidarity among NATO partners is essential, especially when facing emerging global threats.”

Hegseth's comments have reignited debate over America's unilateralism in military affairs and the value of its alliances. With shifting global dynamics and rising security challenges, defense diplomacy may need a recalibration rooted in mutual recognition and shared sacrifice.

As the U.S. reflects on its post-Afghanistan military strategy, voices within and outside Washington urge a more inclusive narrative that honors the collective efforts of all nations involved. Dismissing allied contributions could hinder future coalition-building in potential conflict zones.

MENAFN12062025000228011069ID1109664836