(MENAFN- AzerNews)
By Orkhan Amashov
Over the past two months, some of the news from the
Turkish-Armenian normalisation front has been of a nature that
revealed the plethora of deeply-entrenched, but ultimately
obsolete, inner anxieties shaping the South Caucasian nation. A
poltergeist that stubbornly refuses to be exorcised has again
cluttered the minds of a significant proportion of the Armenian
population, as could be ascertained from a digest of the country's
local media, preaching the old fiction that any rapprochement would
lead to the absorption of this denuded tiny country into a vast and
continuously expanding Türkiye.
The worry that has long been part and parcel of the opposition's
rhetoric, particularly that of former Armenian President Robert
Kocharyan, is vividly noticeable: Yerevan risks becoming a province
of Türkiye. Now that in early July, the sides agreed to enable
third-country citizens to cross the land border and commence air
cargo logistics between the countries, and deeper forms of
normalisation measures are being envisaged, some arguments of a
realistic economic nature have been voiced to counteract the
process.
Most of the concerns boil down to the fear of being unable to
compete with the Turkish market once the land border is open and
trading is in full swing. Agriculture is at the forefront. The fear
is that the inundation of far more competitive, superior quality
and cheap Turkish products may“kill Armenian farms”.
On a different note, the prospective Turkish presence has
spurred fears of a rise in property prices, paving the way, as some
local residents of the bordering village of Margara suggested in an
interview with Eurasianet, to the Turkification of certain parts of
Armenia. The rationale is simple: Turks will move en-masse and
offer better deals, and, in a short span of time, the demographics
will change.
It may appear churlish to dismiss these concerns as nonsensical
and overdramatic as, in practical terms, the aforementioned
eventualities cannot be overruled, if taken as separate cases. Yet,
what matters a great deal is an appreciation of the full extent of
the normalisation and its realistic implications, rather than
unfounded fears of being absorbed, compounded by a lack of
assertiveness and self-belief.
It should also be noted that the present process is mostly
focused on bringing relations between the two countries to a bare
minimum of diplomacy so as to be able to progress further.
Currently, the focus is on putting the necessary infrastructure in
place in order to ease the future border crossing. Plus, it is yet
to be agreed in bilateral talks, for instance, which customs duties
will be levied on imports and how liberal the regulations will be
regarding real estate purchases.
In the face of an incessantly peddled Turkish takeover scenario,
it is incumbent upon the Armenian government to make a convincing
case for the normalisation, focusing on its full extent, beyond
fragmentary observations. In January of this year, Prime Minister
Nikol Pashinyan acknowledged that, in some economic sectors,
Armenian goods may lose their competitiveness, but the opening of
the border will usher in new opportunities, hitherto unknown.
However, Yerevan has a lot to do in the department of convincing
the populace of the critical desirability of the normalisation.
In the meantime, on the diplomatic front, there have been some
tangible, yet limited, developments. July was a positive month in
this vein. In addition to certain understandings, there was the
inaugural telephonic conversation between Turkish President Erdogan
and the Armenian PM on 11 July, whereby the two leaders
congratulated each other on their respective religious holidays and
emphasised a mutual desire to follow the current trajectory.
It also seems that the Special Envoys designated to oversee the
process, Serdar Kilic and Ruben Rubinyan, Ankara's and Yerevant's
appointees respectively, have developed a cordial and effective
rapport, with one Turkish diplomatic source candidly suggesting, as
the Middle East Eye news agency reports, that the two have held
hundreds of phone conversations in the most amicable fashion.
Both sides appear to agree that this is not a time for
engendering extremely high and currently impracticable
expectations, but to instigate some confidence-building measures,
agreeing on technicalities and ensuring that diplomatic relations
are resumed soon. Any reference to the alleged events of 1915 has
so far been absent during the negotiations, which is a positive
development. Yet, it is understood by Ankara that there will be no
issue regarding clear recognition of each other's territorial
integrity, as Armenia has already expressed its readiness to
officially renounce any claim on sovereign Turkish territory.
Baku is not an official party to the discussions, but Ankara has
repeatedly reiterated that Azerbaijan is its red line. It remains
to be seen as to what extent the Zangazur corridor is actively
incorporated into the process, as the megaproject in question is
one of the key contemporary geopolitical objectives of President
Aliyev who is in full accord with President Erdogan.
In terms of confidence-building and upgrading talks to a deeper
level, the Turkish side actively promotes the idea of hosting the
next round of talks either in Ankara or Yerevan on a bilateral
basis, without involving third parties. The conclusive Armenian
view perspective has so far not been made unequivocally clear.
Overall, we can observe that these are small, yet critical,
moves, replete with trepidation. This normalisation has more than a
meagre chance to be a success story. A surfeit of pluck and courage
to take tough, perhaps immediately unpopular - from Armenia's
perception - decisions are needed to ensure that the whole process
does not become stillborn as a tasteless charade of rigmaroles or a
tower of failings. Augmented rapprochement with far-fetching
consequences will follow only thenceforth.
---
Follow us on Twitter @AzerNewsAz
MENAFN26082022000195011045ID1104759924
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.