Millions watch QF's Doha Debates forum on pros & cons of socialism

(MENAFN- The Peninsula) Doha: In a Doha Debates programme watched by millions globally, newsmakers from three continents have debated whether the coronavirus pandemic should serve as a catalyst for more — and lasting — socialist policies around the world.

The virtual debate featured renowned Pakistani, British, and Brazilian figures arguing three points of view on socialism — for, against, and a refined balance between socialism and capitalism.

The solutions-focused forum, a production of Qatar Foundation's Doha Debates, included author and commentator Fatima Bhutto; former UK Foreign Secretary and House of Commons Leader Lord William Hague; and Brazilian congresswoman and activist Tabata Amaral.

Citing inequalities further exposed and heightened by the COVID-19 crisis, Bhutto argued for a radically reimagined system, and said, 'Our world is broken beyond repair, and capitalism doesn't work the way it's advertised. More and more people the world over see socialism as an alternative to this very broken system.

Lord Hague warned against a tilt toward socialism, saying, 'We do have to address inequality in the world, but the answer is not holding people back. 'We need more innovation, enterprise and freedom for a new generation, and less socialism so that generation can use their talents to the full.

Amaral called for a more nuanced approach, saying: 'As polarization increases, people tend to see economic growth and social development as opposite goals, when, in reality, both things must and do go hand in hand.

She added that: 'We need to combine the ideals of both capitalism and socialism. Programme host and moderator Ghida Fakhry, and conflict resolution expert Govinda Clayton, urged the debaters to bridge their differences in an effort to find a consensus on the best socio-economic path forward. The programme's millions of viewers included a select group of young people who formed the voting panel on the merits of the arguments presented by the debaters. In the first of two rounds of voting, Bhutto's argument resonated the most with the audience, garnering 44.73 percent of the vote, with Amaral coming in second with 37.04 percent, and Lord Hague with the remaining 18.23 percent.

In the second round of voting, Amaral gained a few more votes, with 42.06 percent of the vote, but Bhutto kept her lead at 43.23 percent. Lord Hague's argument lost some of its popularity and got 14.71 percent of the vote. Encouraged to join the conversation by Doha Debates correspondent Nelufar Hedayat, viewers around the world provided real-time feedback.

Ogova Ondego, from Nairobi, Kenya, said: 'At this juncture, it does no harm to try out this strategy; any useful strategy. Brandon Ferderer, from Brooklyn, New York, added: 'The problem is unfettered capitalism — just as socialism may lead to communism at its extreme, we need to recognize that there is a tendency for capitalism to become [an] oligarchy, wherein the political classes and the corporate elites work together to maintain a stranglehold on wealth — we tend not to critique the extreme ends of capitalism in the same way we do socialism.


Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.