Earthquakes caused by industrial activities: what are the risks and how can they be reduced?

(MENAFN- The Conversation) On September 3, 2016, a magnitude 5.8 earthquake struck just northwest of Pawnee, Oklahoma, causing moderate to severe damages in buildings nearthe epicenter . It was the largest ever recorded in the state.

The Pawnee earthquake followed the dramatic increase of seismic events in the central United States beginning in 2009, associated with the increase of underground wastewater disposal byoil and gas operators . This and other events in the area raised public concerns and led governmental agencies to shut down injection wells andestablish new regulations regarding wastewater injections .

While human-caused earthquakes have been documented for more than a century, their increasing number reported worldwide has drawn muchscientific, social and political attention . Such earthquakes are related to industrial activities such as mining, construction of water dams, injection of liquids such as waste water and carbon dioxide, and extractions associated with oil and gas exploitation.

With the ever-increasing demand for energy and mineral supplies worldwide, the number of human-caused earthquakes is expected torise in the upcoming years . Some of the largest and more destructive earthquakes of the past few years have been related to man-made activities, suchas the 2008 magnitude 7.9 Wenchuan (China) earthquakeand the 2015 magnitude 7.8Nepal earthquake .

In most of the cases industrial activities do not induce earthquakes. But this becomes problematic when such activities are close to active faults. In this case, even small stresses underground caused by man-made activities can destabilise faults, inducing earthquakes.

Such stresses, such as fluid injections, are even capable of migrating long distances in the planetary crust, can induce earthquakes days, months or even years after the injection.

The above figure shows that as fluid pressure at the top of the well Basel 1 (purple line) was increasing during injection, the induced seismicity rate also increased (bluish bars). In the bottom figure, the average squared distance of the induced earthquakes from the well is shown, which indicates the complex propagation of seismicity away from the well over time. The largest-earthquakes (magnitude greater than 3, shown with stars) occurred after the injection ended.

Such problems, along with the general lack of knowledge of the exact stress and faulting conditions below ground, make such earthquakes difficult to forecast or manage.

In Europe, where the population density is higher than the United States, public concern over man-made earthquakes is greater. In thewell-known case of Basel, Switzerland , which took place in 2006, approximately 11,500 cubic metres of water were injected at high pressure into a 5-km deep well to make the extraction of geothermal energy possible. During the injection phase, more than 10,000 earthquakes were induced, including some strong events that were felt in Basel itself. These raised public concern and anger, leading to the termination of the project and to morethan $9 million on damage claims .

In Southern Europe, which has a higher risk ofnatural occurring earthquakes , public tolerance on induced earthquakes due to industrial activities is even more limited. The deadly 2012 Emilia (Italy) earthquake sequence became a topic of sustained public debate and political discussion, based on theproximity of the earthquake epicentres to an oil field .

The Italian government established an international committee to investigate, and while no clear link between regional seismicity and oil-extraction was found, one wasn't excluded either. Other studies concluded that the earthquakes were anatural event .

Another recent case is that of the Castor project, an underground offshore gas-storage facility in the Gulf of Valencia, Spain. The US$2 billion project was terminated by the Spanish government in 2014 following a burst of regional seismicity immediatelyafter the initiation of gas-injection operations , and the public concern that followed.

The above European Seismic Hazard Map displays the most seismically hazardous areas in Europe measured by thepeak ground acceleration(PGA) that may be expected during an earthquake, with a 10% probability to be reached or exceeded in 50 years. Green indicates comparatively low hazard values of PGA below 0.1g; yellow to orange show a moderate hazard, between 0.1-to-0.25g; and red identify high-hazard areas withPGA of more than 0.25 .

The previous cases illustrate some of the coming challenges to be faced with man-made earthquakes. The ability to distinguish between natural and human-induced earthquakes can be difficult or even impossible, especially in seismically active regions, while in other cases the risk associated with industrial activities issignificantly underestimated . Such problems pose novel challenges for risk mitigation and economic growth, especially in seismically active regions such as Southern Europe.

The image above illustrates the drilling and extraction operations may take place near or within seismically active regions, increasing the risk of activating faults and/or accelerating the occurrence of earthquakes that would otherwise would occur naturally sometime in the future.

To significantly reduce such hazards,regulations are requiredthat include hazard modelling as well as assessment before and during industrial activity that might perturb regional stress fields. Such regulations were recently issued in North America, including California, Oklahoma, Ohio and Texas, as well as in and Canada. In Europe, the EU has not yet issued any such regulations, but guidelines have been put forth in some countries that have experienced induced earthquakes, including the Netherlands, Switzerland, the UK, Germany, France and Italy.

In addition, communication campaigns that will inform the public on the economic benefits and the risks that such industrial operations may have, should also put forth. Such measures will assure the effective mitigation of the associated risk and the sustainability of the industrial project.

Created in 2007, the Axa Research Fund supports more than 500 projets around the world conducted by researchers from 51 countries. To find out more about the work of Georgios Michas, visit thededicated site .

Fossil fuels
Seismology
Earthquakes
Fracking
United States
Europe
gas exploration
oil exploration
The Conversation France
Global perspectives
Axa Research Fund (English)

MENAFN1007201901990000ID1098741721

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.