A Third Of Swiss Find Aid For Crans-Montana Victims Too Generous

For 31% of those polled,“solidarity aid of CHF50,000 per person, in addition to other compensation paid by insurance companies and the canton of Valais” was considered too high. Of those surveyed, 37% consider it adequate, 11% too low and 21% don't know.

For a third of men (33%), the CHF50,000 is too generous. This opinion is shared by 29% of women. The aid is also considered too high by 43% of right-wing Swiss People's Party voters and 31% of supporters of the centre-right Radical-Liberals. This figure falls to 27% among Centre Party supporters and 21% among left-wing voters (Social Democrats and Greens).

+ Swiss government to provide solidarity payment for Crans-Montana fire victims

The younger the respondents, the more they consider the sum of CHF50,000 to be too generous. This was the case for 37% of 19-34 year-olds, 35% of 37-49 year-olds, 28% of 50-64 year-olds and 24% of those aged 65 and over. The vast majority of the victims were teenagers and young adults.

Furthermore, a third (33%) of people living in the countryside or on the limits of urban areas felt that the Confederation's approach was too generous, compared with a quarter of city dwellers (25%). Finally, people with no formal education are more likely than those with a university degree (37% versus 25%) to disapprove of the federal government's approach.

During the spring session, the Swiss parliament approved a solidarity contribution of CHF50,000 for the victims of the fire and their families. The contribution could be paid out as early as this spring. The New Year's fire in a bar in Crans-Montana left 41 people dead and 115 injured.

+ Mayor of Crans-Montana under investigation for involuntary manslaughter

The survey, conducted by the LeeWas institute, was carried out between March 5-8 with 17,788 people: 12,594 residents of German-speaking Switzerland, 4,686 in French-speaking Switzerland and 508 in Ticino. The margin of error for this opinion poll is plus or minus 2.2%.

Translated from French with DeepL/gw

We select the most relevant news for an international audience and use automatic translation tools to translate them into English. A journalist then reviews the translation for clarity and accuracy before publication.

Providing you with automatically translated news gives us the time to write more in-depth articles. The news stories we select have been written and carefully fact-checked by an external editorial team from news agencies such as Bloomberg or Keystone.

If you have any questions about how we work, write to us at ....

In compliance with the JTI standards

More: SWI swissinfo certified by the Journalism Trust Initiati

You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here. Please join us!

If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at ....