(MENAFN- Live Mint) The Karnataka government made a momentous move as it acknowledged the impact of menstruation on women's health. It extended one day of paid menstrual leave per month to employees in the government sector.

This notification comes almost a month after the government had issued an order mandating one day of paid menstrual leave a month to women aged 18-52. Establishments registered under the Factories Act, 1948; Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1961; Plantation Workers Act, 1951; Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966; and Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961, will have to provide this facility to women working in permanent, contractual and outsourced jobs.

Also Read | Karnataka holiday calendar 2026: Full list of public and restricted holidays

This recent directive is applicable to women working in all industries and establishments. This directive was enforced with immediate effect on 2 December, allowing female government employees of the state to take one day of menstrual leave every month.

As per the order, all women government employees between the age group 18 and 52 are eligible to avail this one-day leave during their menstruation days. No medical certificate is required to avail this leave, PTI reported citing the order said.

The order further noted,“This leave should be entered separately in the leave/attendance book, and should not be combined with any other leave.”

Also Read | Karnataka HC denies Prajwal Revanna's bid to pause jail term in rape conviction BHA challenges Karnataka govt's directive

Challenging the state government's directive, the Bangalore Hotels Association (BHA) approached the Karnataka High Courtin in November after menstrual leave was made compulsory for women employees across various sectors. Questioning the basis of the order, it had alleged that the state itself has not extended such leave to women working in government departments.

Also Read | Karnataka govt. imposes 10% lifetime tax on high-end electric vehicles

Terming the order as discriminatory, it highlighted out that the state did not implement a similar provision for its own workforce despite being one of the largest employers of women.

MENAFN04122025007365015876ID1110435387