403
Sorry!!
Error! We're sorry, but the page you were looking for doesn't exist.
Trump's Colombia Showdown: What Petro's Fight Reveals About Power In The Americas
(MENAFN- The Rio Times) Key Points
The drama began with a soundbite and a tweet. After a U.S. naval operation against suspected drug boats in the Caribbean, Donald Trump told reporters that any country producing and selling drugs into the United States,“including Colombia,” could face attacks.
Within hours, Colombia's president Gustavo Petro replied on X:“Do not threaten our sovereignty, because you will awaken the jaguar. Attacking our sovereignty is declaring war.”
From afar, this can look like just another Trump quarrel. In reality, it is a test of Washington's new playbook in its own hemisphere.
On one side is a U.S. government that has shifted from speeches to hard tools: tariffs, visa bans, decertification in the drug war and targeted strikes.
On the other is a left-wing leader who talks of dignity and independence, but whose country remains the world's largest cocaine producer and depends heavily on U.S. trade and intelligence.
The backstory shows why the tone has sharpened. Petro refused to accept U.S. deportation flights carrying migrants in shackles; Trump replied with tariffs on Colombian exports and visa limits for officials, and Bogotá soon backed down.
Washington later ruled that Colombia was failing in its drug-control commitments and signalled that parts of the security and aid relationship were no longer automatic.
Each step narrows Colombia's room to manoeuvre while letting Trump tell voters he is tough with partners who underperform.
That is the story behind the story. What looks like a personal feud is really a warning to the rest of Latin America. Governments that mix ideological speeches with weak results on drugs, migration or security can expect fewer friendly visits and more pressure.
For Lula's Brazil, which wants Chinese investment and access to the U.S. market, the Colombia case now works as a lesson in how far Washington is prepared to go when a neighbour stops aligning with its priorities.
Trump is using economic pressure and a threat of force to squeeze Colombia over drugs.
Petro answers with nationalist speeches, but Colombia's reliance on U.S. markets limits his leverage.
The clash previews how Washington may treat other Latin American leaders who drift away.
The drama began with a soundbite and a tweet. After a U.S. naval operation against suspected drug boats in the Caribbean, Donald Trump told reporters that any country producing and selling drugs into the United States,“including Colombia,” could face attacks.
Within hours, Colombia's president Gustavo Petro replied on X:“Do not threaten our sovereignty, because you will awaken the jaguar. Attacking our sovereignty is declaring war.”
From afar, this can look like just another Trump quarrel. In reality, it is a test of Washington's new playbook in its own hemisphere.
On one side is a U.S. government that has shifted from speeches to hard tools: tariffs, visa bans, decertification in the drug war and targeted strikes.
On the other is a left-wing leader who talks of dignity and independence, but whose country remains the world's largest cocaine producer and depends heavily on U.S. trade and intelligence.
The backstory shows why the tone has sharpened. Petro refused to accept U.S. deportation flights carrying migrants in shackles; Trump replied with tariffs on Colombian exports and visa limits for officials, and Bogotá soon backed down.
Washington later ruled that Colombia was failing in its drug-control commitments and signalled that parts of the security and aid relationship were no longer automatic.
Each step narrows Colombia's room to manoeuvre while letting Trump tell voters he is tough with partners who underperform.
That is the story behind the story. What looks like a personal feud is really a warning to the rest of Latin America. Governments that mix ideological speeches with weak results on drugs, migration or security can expect fewer friendly visits and more pressure.
For Lula's Brazil, which wants Chinese investment and access to the U.S. market, the Colombia case now works as a lesson in how far Washington is prepared to go when a neighbour stops aligning with its priorities.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Most popular stories
Market Research
More Story
Comments
No comment