U.S. Treasury Forces Brazilian Banks To Choose Between U.S. And Brazilian Law
(MENAFN- The Rio Times) U.S. Treasury's OFAC notified five major Brazilian banks on September 2 to enforce sanctions against Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes.
The Magnitsky Act freezes any of Moraes's U.S. assets and bars American institutions from serving him. OFAC asked Banco do Brasil, Bradesco, Itaú, Santander Brasil and BTG Pactual to report steps taken to block his accounts and transactions.
Failure to comply risks fines or losing access to U.S. dollar clearing and global markets. Meanwhile, Brazil's Supreme Federal Court ruled that foreign sanctions have no effect without congressional approval.
Justices Moraes and Flávio Dino warned regulators may penalize banks that act under U.S. orders. After that ruling, Brazilian bank shares fell sharply on investor fears of regulatory conflict.
This clash shows a battle between Brazil's judicial sovereignty and U.S. extraterritorial reach. Washington uses Magnitsky to swiftly target corruption and human rights abuses worldwide.
Brazil relies on U.S. dollar funding and correspondent banks to finance trade and investment. Banks must navigate both U.S. sanctions law and Brazil's domestic legal limits.
Complying with OFAC could breach Brazilian law; defying it could cut banks off from U.S. markets.
The outcome will influence how global banks handle dual-jurisdiction demands.
It may also redefine the limits of financial sanctions as instruments of foreign policy.
The Magnitsky Act freezes any of Moraes's U.S. assets and bars American institutions from serving him. OFAC asked Banco do Brasil, Bradesco, Itaú, Santander Brasil and BTG Pactual to report steps taken to block his accounts and transactions.
Failure to comply risks fines or losing access to U.S. dollar clearing and global markets. Meanwhile, Brazil's Supreme Federal Court ruled that foreign sanctions have no effect without congressional approval.
Justices Moraes and Flávio Dino warned regulators may penalize banks that act under U.S. orders. After that ruling, Brazilian bank shares fell sharply on investor fears of regulatory conflict.
This clash shows a battle between Brazil's judicial sovereignty and U.S. extraterritorial reach. Washington uses Magnitsky to swiftly target corruption and human rights abuses worldwide.
Brazil relies on U.S. dollar funding and correspondent banks to finance trade and investment. Banks must navigate both U.S. sanctions law and Brazil's domestic legal limits.
Complying with OFAC could breach Brazilian law; defying it could cut banks off from U.S. markets.
The outcome will influence how global banks handle dual-jurisdiction demands.
It may also redefine the limits of financial sanctions as instruments of foreign policy.

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Most popular stories
Market Research

- Daytrading Publishes New Study On The Dangers Of AI Tools Used By Traders
- Primexbt Launches Empowering Traders To Succeed Campaign, Leading A New Era Of Trading
- Wallpaper Market Size, Industry Overview, Latest Insights And Forecast 2025-2033
- Excellion Finance Scales Market-Neutral Defi Strategies With Fordefi's MPC Wallet
- ROVR Releases Open Dataset To Power The Future Of Spatial AI, Robotics, And Autonomous Systems
- Ethereum-Based Meme Project Pepeto ($PEPETO) Surges Past $6.5M In Presale
Comments
No comment