AI Tool Flags Over 1,000 Dubious Scientific Journals

A new AI-driven system developed by researchers at the University of Colorado Boulder is screening open-access publications for signs of predatory behaviour, and has already flagged more than 1,000 questionable titles.

The AI platform combs through metadata-such as website design, domain registration, editorial board listings, grammar quality and citation patterns-to identify red flags. From a sample of about 15,200 journals, the system initially marked over 1,400 as potentially problematic. Human experts then reviewed a subset, determining that around 1,000 truly raise concerns about publication standards and peer review integrity.

Daniel Acuña, associate professor of computer science and lead author of the study published in Science Advances on 27 August, cautions that the tool is only a preliminary filter. he emphasises that the final determination of a journal's legitimacy must involve human judgement.

Predatory journals-those that solicit researchers, often charging substantial fees while bypassing genuine peer review-have long undermined trust in academic publishing. Jeffrey Beall, the librarian who popularised the term in 2009, maintained a widely referenced online list before it was shut down in 2017 amid controversy.

These deceptive publishers are notoriously adaptable, frequently shifting names and websites once exposed, complicating efforts to maintain accurate blacklists. The AI system's ability to detect recurring patterns across many such entities may provide a significant advantage.

How the system works reveals important analytical capabilities. It spots anomalies such as excessive self-citations, unusually high output volume, and author profiles with numerous affiliations-characteristics sometimes correlated with predatory behaviour. The design of the tool also avoids opacity; researchers made an effort to keep it interpretable so users understand its reasoning.

For Acuña, the tool could serve as a pre-screening mechanism-what he terms a“firewall for science”-allowing human experts to focus on the most troubling cases. Institutions such as universities and academic publishers are its likely prospective users.

While the AI is not yet publicly accessible, researchers hope to make it available soon to universities and publishers looking to safeguard research standards.

Predatory journals often target early-career researchers and those outside traditional publishing strongholds by promising rapid publication in return for fees - but rarely deliver genuine peer review. The problem has been particularly pronounced in open-access publishing, where costs shift from subscribers to authors.

This AI platform arrives amid heightened concerns over academic integrity and the credibility of scientific outputs. By accelerating the detection of suspect journals, it could help preserve the reliability of the scientific record-but only if paired with thorough human scrutiny.

MENAFN02092025000152002308ID1110007569