Britons Increasingly Trust Each Other But Trust In Politicians Has Slumped Since The Pandemic

(MENAFN- The Conversation) One surprise in the early days of the pandemic was people's increased willingness to trust political authorities. According to the British Social Attitudes survey (BSA), the proportion of people trusting government ministers rose from 15% in 2019 to 23% in 2020. Data from Ipsos MORI showed a similar bounce for trust in government ministers and politicians in 2021. Trust in government was also a significant factor in whether people complied with lockdown rules and other restrictions.

Since then, however, people's trust in government has plummeted. The latest BSA survey finds that, in 2023, just 14% of the population said they trust government“always” or“most of the time”. Fully 45% of the population trust government“almost never”. These are the most negative set of figures since the BSA began asking questions on trust almost four decades ago.

This collapse in trust is perhaps unsurprising given the various government shenanigans over the past few years, notably Boris Johnson's Downing Street lockdown parties and Liz Truss's disastrous prime ministerial tenure. However, there is also evidence that Britons have become less trusting as a result of dashed expectations over the benefits of Brexit, negative views of government performance in areas like health, and cost of living pressures.

Yet while Britons are less trusting of those with political authority, they appear to be more trusting in each other. Back in 1999, 29% of the population believed that“most people [in Britain] can be trusted”. Four decades on, that proportion has increased to 46% , topping the previous high of 43% in 1981. This might partly reflect the sense of collective endeavour and neighbourliness that was instilled during the pandemic, when we were encouraged to look out for, and help, other people. There is also evidence that, while people see the country as a whole as becoming more divided, at the local level perceptions of unity outweigh perceptions of division.

This is a welcome shift, particularly since trust in other people is associated with a range of positive outcomes, including support for international cooperation and international organisations . In an uncertain and dangerous world, social trust may be an important factor shaping the willingness of states to work together.

Wellbeing of politicians

The decline of popular trust in government and politicians is concerning. Low trust is associated with support for populist politicians such as Donald Trump and upheavals like Brexit . Low trust could also significantly compromise public acceptance of, and compliance with, official messages and rules in a future pandemic.

Distrust can also cause direct harm to public figures. As one of us (James) has shown, politicians are generally poor estimators of public trust in themselves. But where they do perceive widespread distrust , often because of repeated experiences of physical or online abuse and intimidation, this has a significant negative effect on their mental health and wellbeing.

Messages of kindness and community around London during lockdown. Alex Yeung/Shutterstock

Increased security around MPs – the cost of which jumped from £77,234.67 to £4,381,733.40 between 2014 and 2022 – is likely to protect them from the worst excesses of public distrust where it trickles over into extreme behaviour. Yet given the importance of contact for people's trust , it could also inadvertently fuel more cynicism by increasing the physical distance between politicians and the public.

The public's declining regard for politicians and government should be a source of concern. We are hardly likely to recruit the calibre of politician we expect (and need), or indeed encourage a more diverse population of aspiring representatives, if the personal costs of holding elected office are so high.

At the same time, a look at the bigger picture offers some reassurance. As one of us (Ben) has recently shown , there is little evidence that low trust induces popular scepticism towards democracy itself, or that it weakens public support for state spending or government programmes in key areas like healthcare.

Trust on the frontline

The nature and strength of Britain's civic ties are revealed not only in our trust of politicians and institutions, but also in how we treat the people who provide public services, such as police officers and health workers.

On the face of it, the picture is not pretty. Over the past few years, rates of public abuse towards frontline service providers have increased. In 2021, 18% of teachers reported having experienced verbal abuse from a parent or carer in the past year. In 2023, that figure had risen to 30% .

A survey of police officers in 2022 found that 37% had experienced verbal insults at least once a week over the past year. This was an increase from the 29% of officers who reported a similar level of insults in 2020, although the figure dropped slightly in 2023 to 34% .

Rates of physical abuse of London ambulance staff have more than doubled in four years, with 346 incidents recorded in 2019, increasing to 728 incidents in 2023 . A similar picture of public abuse is found for frontline workers in the health service. Polling in 2023 found that 85% of GPs across the UK had received verbal abuse from members of the public during the past year. A 2021 survey by the British Medical Association found more than half of GPs, and one in five hospital doctors, had experienced verbal abuse in the past month .

While majorities of the British public express trust in many frontline workers such as nurses and doctors (who currently attract 94% and 88% trust ratings ), others appear to take a more negative view, extending even to abusive behaviour.

Given the range of service providers facing such rising antipathy, it seems unlikely that the trigger for this was the pandemic. A better clue is provided by longer-term data on public treatment of doctors.

Responses are to a survey question reading 'In the last 12 months, have you personally experienced harassment, bullying or abuse at work from patients, their relatives or members of the public?'. Author provided, data from NHS Staff Survey

NHS survey figures show that rates of abuse towards doctors declined between 2003 and 2011. (The wording of the relevant survey question changed in 2012, which restricts our ability to compare the more recent data). This was precisely the period when resources were pumped into the health service and public satisfaction with the NHS increased . This suggests that public interactions with frontline service workers like doctors are strongly shaped by the quality of the service they face.

Indeed, GPs themselves ascribe the verbal abuse they and their staff experience to people's dissatisfaction with the service, including discontent with access to health services. One underappreciated effect of austerity might thus be an increased public frustration with healthcare workers, which on occasion appears to extend to outright abuse.

More accessible (read: better funded) public services might reduce some negativity towards frontline service workers. However, the important task of rebuilding people's trust in politicians is – particularly given the negative coverage by much of Britain's media – likely to be a trickier task.

MENAFN26032025000199003603ID1109361065