'Wife's Love Affair Without Physical Relations Is NOT Adultery', Rules Madhya Pradesh High Court

(MENAFN- Live Mint) The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that a wife's love affair with someone else is not sufficient to prove adultery and deny her maintenance.

As reported by LiveLaw on Thursday, February 13, the Court stated that sexual intercourse is a necessary component for adultery to be established.

Also Read: Delhi HC seeks Centre's response on PIL seeking to ban Chinese AI Tool DeepSeek

“From Section 144(5) of the BNSS/125(4) of the Cr.P.C. it is clear that only if the wife is proved to be living in adultery, then the maintenance amount can be denied. Adultery necessary means sexual intercourse. Even if a wife is having a love and affection towards somebody else without any physical relations, then that by itself cannot be sufficient to hold that the wife is living in adultery,” held Justice G.S. Ahluwalia, as reported by LiveLaw.

What was the case?

The revisionist husband approached the High Court challenging the order of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Chhindwara (M.P.), which had granted interim maintenance of ₹4,000 to the respondent's wife.

Also Read: Chhattisgarh HC rules husband cannot be prosecuted for 'unnatural sex'; says 'consent of wife loses importance'

The husband argued that he was earning only ₹8,000, and the wife was already receiving ₹4,000 as interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

He further claimed that the wife was involved in a love affair and that his father had deprived him of his ancestral property, LiveLaw reported.

Also Read: Is Hindu marriage valid without '7 phere'? Here's what Supreme Court say

Here's what the Court held

The Court upheld the Trial Court's decision to award Rs. 4,000 in maintenance under Section 125 of the CrPC, noting that it had already considered the interim maintenance granted under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

MENAFN14022025007365015876ID1109206335