Questioning China's Ability To Actually Fight
(MENAFN- Asia Times)
China's military may be modernizing rapidly, but deep-rooted structural flaws, Political control and a lack of combat experience could limit its battlefield effectiveness in a potential war with the US and its allies.
Last month, the RAND Corporation think tank released a report questioning the combat readiness of China's People's Liberation army (PLA) despite its breakneck modernization.
RAND argues that while the PLA boasts advanced weaponry and the world's largest navy, it prioritizes upholding Chinese Communist Party (CCP) rule over actually preparing for war.
The report highlights systemic issues, including promotions based on loyalty over merit, ideological training over combat realism and centralized decision-making that hinders battlefield adaptability.
RAND compares the PLA's modernization to historical cases where military strength failed to ensure battlefield success, citing the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian War and the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese War. The report suggests China's military reforms remain slow and incomplete, emphasizing deterrence and political control over operational effectiveness.
A separate RAND report examines the PLA's dual challenge of demographic decline and modernization. It notes that while China's shrinking population poses long-term concerns, the PLA still has a significantly larger youth pool than the US. However, poor recruitment incentives, unattractive service conditions and competition from the private sector hinder efforts to attract elite talent.
Cultural barriers, such as military service's low social status and a conscription-based model, further complicate China's military modernization. Despite major investments, the PLA struggles to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping's vision for a world-class military. If recruitment challenges persist, RAND suggests China may need to rethink its military doctrine and force structure.
While RAND critiques the PLA's centralized command structure, Chinese military doctrine stresses political oversight and ideological cohesion to prevent military insubordination-a feature the CCP views as a strength rather than a liability.
In a November 2023 article for The Strategist, Payton Rawson explains that China's dual command system in the PLA integrates military and political leadership to ensure CCP control.
MENAFN03022025000159011032ID1109159685
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.