Old Monk Sales Ban: Rum Maker Withdraws Court Plea, Agrees To Revise Labels After FSSAI Objections
FSSAI had objected to the use of the term "rum" on products containing added flavouring agents, directing that they be labelled and marketed as "rum-flavoured spirit" instead. The regulator had also raised concerns over descriptions such as "7 Years Old Blended" and "Very Old Vatted".
The authority had barred the sale and distribution of several Old Monk products manufactured at the company's Khopoli facility.
Also Read | Tanvi Patri's father recalls Youth Olympics final heartbreak: 'Papa, I lost...' Old Monk maker agrees to revise product labelsDuring a hearing on Thursday, a bench led by Chief Justice Maheshchandra Tripathi and Justice Advait Sethna was informed by the company that it would revise the product labels and submit the updated versions to FSSAI for approval.
The company's decision to withdraw its petition follows the court's refusal to grant interim relief against the regulator's order.
Why did FSSAI restrict the sale of certain Old Monk products?The dispute centres on the classification and labelling of certain Old Monk variants. FSSAI's objection was that products containing added flavouring agents should be described as "rum-flavoured spirit" rather than "rum".
The regulator also questioned the use of age-related and product descriptions such as "7 Years Old Blended" and "Very Old Vatted".
Also Read | Diwali Muhurat trading: Why do NSE, BSE open for live trading session on Diwali?The sales and distribution restriction applied to several products manufactured at the company's Khopoli facility.
Old Monk maker had cited over ₹350 crore loss in excise revenueThe brewer had earlier argued that the sales restriction had resulted in a loss of more than ₹350 crore in excise revenue for the Maharashtra government.
Also Read | Liam Lawson faces uncertain F1 future as Racing Bulls delay 2027 decisionHowever, after the Bombay High Court declined to grant interim relief against the FSSAI order, the company chose not to pursue the case on merits and withdrew its petition.
The court subsequently disposed of the matter.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any
responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos,
licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues
related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Comments
No comment