Egypt Asks For Return Of Ancient Mummy Behind Scots Controversy
Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum in Scotland's largest city took the corpse of Nekht out of public view in late October because of a lack of“consent from the deceased” or their descendants, according to local media reports.
“We are currently in the process of communicating and taking the measures” required for Nekht's possible return, Egyptian Tourism Minister Sherif Fathy told Bloomberg by phone.“We shall see how things unfold as such issues aren't straightforward.”
Egypt, where Pharonic-era pyramids, temples and tombs are a major draw for foreign tourists, has long sought the legal return of ancient artifacts that were taken abroad in recent centuries. The North African nation inaugurated the high-tech $1 billion Grand Egyptian Museum last year, which now houses some of its most famed treasures.
The Kelvingrove museum's operators, Glasgow Life, earlier said they'd received an Egyptian request to return Nekht's remains, without specifying who'd made it.
The charity's decision to remove the mummy from display in Scotland followed a recent change in the ethics code of the International Council of Museums urging the“inherent dignity” of human remains be respected.
Glasgow's nearby Hunterian Museum has decided to cover the more than 2,500-year-old body of Lady Shep-En-Hor in a specially designed textile while leaving her sarcophagus on view, the BBC reported.
Egypt, also famed for its Nile cruises and Mediterranean and Red Sea beach resorts, targets attracting a record 20 million tourists this year and 22 million in 2027.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg
©2026 Bloomberg L.P.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Comments
No comment