Kim's China Trip May Have Been More Than Economic Event: South Korean Minister
"The fact that both sides fielded their diplomatic and security teams deserves a close look," Chung said at a parliamentary audit, responding to a lawmaker's question about the meaning of Kim's surprise one-day trip to the Chinese border city of Dandong on Saturday.
He noted the North Korean delegation was heavy with diplomatic and security officials, and that no economic officials were present at the newly opened bridge over the Amnok River, known in China as the Yalu River, Yonhap News Agency reported.
Kim was joined by his sister Kim Yo-jong, a department director of the Workers' Party of Korea; Jo Yong-won, Ri Il-hwan and Kim Song-nam, secretaries of the party's central committee; Foreign Minister Choe Son-hui; and First Vice Premier Kim Tok-hun, among others.
The Chinese side included Wang Huning, the fourth-ranking official in the Chinese Communist Party; Foreign Minister Wang Yi; Liu Haixing, head of the party's international department; and Executive Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu, who is regarded as a Chinese diplomat with extensive experience in US affairs.
Chung also called Kim's trip "unprecedented" on the grounds that he made a rare visit to China but held no talks with his Chinese counterpart, and attended an event for a bridge meant to boost economic cooperation with China, yet brought mostly his key security aides.
"We have to look carefully at what it means," he said.
His remarks suggested the visit was more than a show of the old alliance and economic ties. It may also have been a chance to prepare for a possible North Korea-US summit.
–IANS
ksk/as
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Comments
No comment