Don't Let Musk And The Billionaires Buy America's Elections

Latest stories The inflation conflagration is back and here to stay What do North Korea's sub missile tests really prove? Attacking Trump, Zelensky showed lack of judgment

But this year, big money has mobilized to defend Republican control. We have not had a major election where one party's spending so dwarfs the other's in at least a half century, likely since the 1972 election that brought us Watergate.

So much money sloshing around can produce odd or extravagant spending, such as expensive television commercials for a Texas Senate race running on football games and the ads boosting Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) that aired in Portland, Oregon, rather than Portland, Maine.

At this late date, more ads might yield minimal impact. That Musk's contributions are paying for Republican get-out-the-vote operations may have a real impact in key states.

The Supreme Court led by John Roberts has told us that this is all glorious free speech, with campaign contributions“the whole point” of the First Amendment.

Elon Musk is a singular figure. We know of his destruction of foreign aid through DOGE, estimated to have cost hundreds of thousands of lives already around the world, his flamboyant celebrity, his status as the world's first trillionaire.

Let's not overthink it. The grubby reality is he's a big federal contractor. According to The Washington Post,“Over the years, Musk and his businesses have received at least $38 billion in government contracts, loans, subsidies, and tax credits, often at critical moments.”

Musk has massive investments in artificial intelligence through platforms such as Grok, just as political debate finally has erupted around that technology. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth just named Musk, another billionaire, and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich to lead Project Meridian to reshape the use of technology in warfare.

Such a blatant attempt to buy the outcome of an election should be a big scandal. As is so often the case, the scandal is not what's illegal, but what's legal.

Once, there were limits on what could be donated to campaigns. No longer. The Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling, other court cases since then, and a Federal Election Commission that lacks even a quorum to act have deregulated money in politics.

Operatives need no longer pretend these funds are“independent.” Musk's spending is public, but this year at least $1.3 billion is dark money from undisclosed donors. (The candidates and officeholders know who they are. Just not voters.)

But candidates and lawmakers must do more than decry corruption. The aftermath of this election must lead to action, to reform that follows scandal.

The Brennan Center has proposed“Nine Solutions for Political Corruption” as part of our series, Solutions for a Stronger Democracy. One of them is especially relevant to the Musk news.

Statutes already purport to bar campaign gifts from federal contractors, but they are more loophole than law. In an article in Just Security published Wednesday, my colleague Eric Petry explains how an expanded and toughened contractor ban would work.