India-US Trade Talks Heading In Right Direction, Jaishankar Says As Both Sides Work To Finalise A Deal
Jaishankar's remarks offer a positive indication from New Delhi as the two countries attempt to conclude a trade pact that has taken longer than initially anticipated. A deal is still being worked out, however, and his comments do not mean that a final agreement has been signed.
The minister's assessment comes amid uncertainty over Washington's changing tariff policies and their implications for Indian exporters. The negotiations have become an important part of the broader India-US relationship, with both sides seeking to strengthen commercial ties while protecting their domestic economic interests.
Also Read | Trade agreement can contribute to 'better' India-US ties, says JaishankarAccording to financial news service Newsquawk, Jaishankar said the talks were heading in the right direction and that a deal was being ironed out.
Why the trade agreement has taken longerIndia and the US announced a framework for the first phase of their bilateral trade agreement in February 2026. Subsequent changes to American tariff policy, however, complicated the process and prompted further discussions.
In September, Jaishankar acknowledged that the negotiations had been more complex than expected, pointing to differences between the two economies and the need to protect sensitive domestic sectors.
India has a large base of small manufacturers, agricultural producers and businesses whose interests could be affected by changes in import duties and market access.
New Delhi has therefore sought to ensure that any agreement offers Indian exporters competitive terms without exposing vulnerable sectors to excessive pressure.
At an event hosted by the Asia Society in New York, Jaishankar said the two sides had reached a stage where there was“more or less an understanding on the trade agreement”. He also cautioned that the remaining issues required careful consideration.
US tariff uncertainty remains a sticking pointOne of the key complications is the evolving American tariff framework, including the ongoing Section 301 process. The provision allows the United States to investigate foreign trade practices it considers unfair and potentially impose additional duties.
Also Read | Jaishankar Explains India's Strategy as US-China Rivalry Reshapes Global OrderJaishankar has questioned when India should conclude an agreement while aspects of the US tariff regime remain unsettled. The uncertainty matters because Indian exporters need clarity on the duties their products will face in the American market.
India is also seeking tariff terms that allow its businesses to compete effectively with exporters from other countries.
Reuters reported on 6 October that the negotiations had encountered fresh obstacles, with officials describing limited progress towards an imminent deal.
Deal could help stabilise bilateral tiesTrade has become a significant source of friction between New Delhi and Washington, alongside disagreements on other diplomatic and economic issues.
Jaishankar has previously said that concluding the agreement could help put bilateral relations on a better footing. For businesses, a settled framework could provide greater certainty on tariffs, market access and investment.
Also Read | Jaishankar says UN 'largely irrelevant', UNSC 'gridlocked': Why it mattersFor now, his latest remarks suggest that negotiations remain active, but important questions are unresolved. The next step will be to translate the stated progress into an agreement acceptable to both governments.
Until the terms are formally concluded, Indian exporters and US businesses will have to contend with uncertainty over the future trading arrangements between the two countries.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Comments
No comment