Anx Robotica Highlights Documented Proscan AI Workflow Performance From Submission To FDA
| Metric |
NaviCam ProScan | Recent FDA-cleared comparator |
| FDA pathway / decision | De Novo DEN230027 Dec. 12, 2023 |
510(k) K254230 Sept. 25, 2026 |
| Mean review time - conventional | 33 min 42 sec |
45.7 min |
| Mean review time - AI-assisted | 3 min 50 sec |
34.4 min |
| Reported mean review-time reduction | 88.6 % | 24.7 % |
| Key cleared AI functions | Suspected-abnormal-image marking; digestive-tract location assistance |
AI Highlights; Suggested Landmarks; Green Detection |
For ProScan, FDA's De Novo summary reports that the prospective multicenter ARTIC study included 133 patients and found mean small-bowel reading time decreased from 33 minutes 42 seconds with standard reading to 3 minutes 50 seconds with AI-assisted reading (p<0.001). Diagnostic yield was 62.4% with standard reading and 73.7% with AI-assisted reading.2
For the recently cleared comparator, FDA's K254230 summary reports that its reader study used 111 patients and found mean review time decreased from 45.7 minutes to 34.4 minutes with AI assistance, a mean difference of 11.3 minutes. The filing also reports AI-assisted patient-level sensitivity of 92.3% and diagnostic yield of 87.6% in that study.3
"The FDA documentation demonstrates that ProScan can materially reduce capsule review time while supporting a physician-led interpretation workflow," said Tim Thomas, Vice President, Regulatory and Clinical Affairs, AnX Robotica. "As AI adoption grows, performance claims should be considered in the context of each product's cleared indication and study design. We believe the clinical evidence supporting ProScan provides a strong foundation for efficient, AI-assisted capsule endoscopy review."
Important Comparison Context
The ProScan and comparator studies were separate clinical evaluations involving different capsule systems, patient populations, study designs, readers, reference standards and validation datasets. The figures above therefore describe results reported in each product's FDA submission. Both products are intended to assist, not replace, clinician interpretation. FDA's ProScan De Novo summary states that the clinician remains responsible for assessment and that ProScan is not intended as a stand-alone diagnostic device. The comparator's clearance similarly describes its AI functions as tools to assist reviewers.4
About AnX Robotica
AnX Robotica develops capsule endoscopy technologies designed to support efficient, high-quality gastrointestinal imaging and interpretation.
FDA source notes
1. FDA 510(k) Summary, K254230, decision Sept. 25, 2026. Identifies NaviCam ProScan (DEN230027) as the primary predicate.
2. FDA De Novo Classification Request, NaviCam ProScan, DEN230027, decision Dec. 12, 2023. ARTIC study results include diagnostic yield of 62.4% standard vs. 73.7% AI+Physician and mean small-bowel reading time of 33:42 standard vs. 3:50 AI-assisted.
3. FDA 510(k) Summary, K254230, Reader Study. Mean reading time 45.7 minutes conventional vs. 34.4 minutes AI-assisted; AI-assisted patient-level sensitivity 92.3%; diagnostic yield 87.6%.
4. FDA DEN230027 indication/limitations and K254230 device description establish that these AI functions assist reviewers and do not replace clinician judgment.
SOURCE AnX Robotica
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Comments
No comment