403
Sorry!!
Error! We're sorry, but the page you were looking for doesn't exist.
China Reshapes Maritime Strategy to Overcome Strategic Chokepoint Risks
(MENAFN) The geopolitics of the 21st century is increasingly influenced not only by territorial control but also by the ability of states to protect, manage or interfere with the flow of trade through oceans, narrow waterways and critical transportation corridors. This dynamic is especially important for China, which is the world’s largest trading nation and among the biggest importers of energy. Its economy therefore remains highly reliant on maritime routes that pass through vulnerable strategic chokepoints.
Vusal Guliyev is an Indo-Pacific and Eurasian affairs analyst at the Center for Analysis of International Relations and Multiculturalism (AIR Center) based in Baku, Azerbaijan.
For years, this dependence has encouraged Beijing to broaden its transportation networks and limit the risks associated with relying on specific maritime passages. However, China’s changing approach to maritime power indicates that avoiding one vulnerable chokepoint does not necessarily remove the underlying strategic risk. Instead, the vulnerability may be transferred to another geographic location, political pressure point or infrastructure hub.
As China strengthens its activities across the Arctic, Indian Ocean and Eurasian overland routes, Beijing is not simply moving away from chokepoint-driven geopolitics. Rather, it is adapting to a more complicated global network in which strategic vulnerabilities can emerge across multiple maritime and land-based corridors.
Vusal Guliyev is an Indo-Pacific and Eurasian affairs analyst at the Center for Analysis of International Relations and Multiculturalism (AIR Center) based in Baku, Azerbaijan.
For years, this dependence has encouraged Beijing to broaden its transportation networks and limit the risks associated with relying on specific maritime passages. However, China’s changing approach to maritime power indicates that avoiding one vulnerable chokepoint does not necessarily remove the underlying strategic risk. Instead, the vulnerability may be transferred to another geographic location, political pressure point or infrastructure hub.
As China strengthens its activities across the Arctic, Indian Ocean and Eurasian overland routes, Beijing is not simply moving away from chokepoint-driven geopolitics. Rather, it is adapting to a more complicated global network in which strategic vulnerabilities can emerge across multiple maritime and land-based corridors.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any
responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos,
licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues
related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Comments
No comment