403
Sorry!!
Error! We're sorry, but the page you were looking for doesn't exist.
US Military Access Spans Over Half of Australia's Defense Facilities
(MENAFN) The US military and American defense contractors now have access to 110 military facilities across Australia — more than half the country's total — according to data compiled by the Nautilus Institute, a California-based think tank, and reported Monday by media.
The figures show the US military directly controls 17 facilities on the Australian mainland and has access to a further 75 facilities operated by Australia, while American defense companies hold access to another 18 sites. Combined, that puts American military or corporate access at 110 facilities out of the nationwide total.
Richard Tanter, honorary professor of political and social studies at the University of Melbourne and author of the study, said the scale of access reflects pervasiveness rather than infiltration, noting that more than half of the defense facilities examined carry some degree of American access. He argued that Washington has spent over a decade building the capacity to use Australia as a staging ground for intensive military operations should conflict with China erupt, while Canberra has "aligned itself with American strategic planning."
The 92 facilities accessible to the US military reportedly serve functions including intelligence gathering, satellite data access, communications interception, training, deployment of military assets, and logistics support for storing weapons, ammunition, and fuel.
Among the most significant sites is the joint US-Australian intelligence facility at Pine Gap in north-central Australia, said to play a key role in identifying targets for US military strikes. The facility houses a ground control station for signals intelligence satellites, a relay station for early-warning missile detection systems, and infrastructure used to intercept foreign satellite communications.
Under a bilateral force posture agreement, US forces and contractors are granted unimpeded access to designated military facilities, on the condition that Australian sovereignty is fully respected.
That American footprint is set to grow further next year, with as many as 1,200 US personnel expected to deploy to the HMAS Stirling naval base on Garden Island in Western Australia. Canberra maintains that the deployment amounts to a "rotation" rather than the establishment of a permanent base.
Former Defense Minister Christopher Pyne said the AUKUS security partnership linking Australia, the US, and the UK is "much more than submarine procurement," adding that it effectively establishes a new US submarine base in the Indian Ocean and hands Washington a "huge strategic advantage."
Current Defense Minister Richard Marles acknowledged that the "US presence is growing" in Australia, calling it vital to national security and confirming the American military footprint will continue expanding in the coming years.
Public Trust in US Slides Among Australians
Separately, polling suggests Australian confidence in the United States is eroding. A Lowy Institute survey found that only 31% of Australians trust the US to act responsibly in global affairs, while just 21% trust President Donald Trump to do the right thing internationally.
A separate poll by the Australia Institute found 59% of Australians believe the country's interests would be better served by a more independent foreign policy than by deepening its alliance with Washington.
Emma Shortis, director of the Australia Institute's international and security affairs program, argued that growing military integration with the US is steadily eroding Australia's capacity for independent, sovereign decision-making. Albert Palazzo of the University of New South Wales warned that the accelerating US military buildup threatens Australian security, accusing the government of "waltzing" the country toward a US-China war. Vince Scappatura, author of a book examining the US lobby's influence on Australian defense policy, described American basing access across the country as a "second wave of colonization," saying Australia is increasingly functioning as a "forward element" for projecting US military power in the region.
The figures show the US military directly controls 17 facilities on the Australian mainland and has access to a further 75 facilities operated by Australia, while American defense companies hold access to another 18 sites. Combined, that puts American military or corporate access at 110 facilities out of the nationwide total.
Richard Tanter, honorary professor of political and social studies at the University of Melbourne and author of the study, said the scale of access reflects pervasiveness rather than infiltration, noting that more than half of the defense facilities examined carry some degree of American access. He argued that Washington has spent over a decade building the capacity to use Australia as a staging ground for intensive military operations should conflict with China erupt, while Canberra has "aligned itself with American strategic planning."
The 92 facilities accessible to the US military reportedly serve functions including intelligence gathering, satellite data access, communications interception, training, deployment of military assets, and logistics support for storing weapons, ammunition, and fuel.
Among the most significant sites is the joint US-Australian intelligence facility at Pine Gap in north-central Australia, said to play a key role in identifying targets for US military strikes. The facility houses a ground control station for signals intelligence satellites, a relay station for early-warning missile detection systems, and infrastructure used to intercept foreign satellite communications.
Under a bilateral force posture agreement, US forces and contractors are granted unimpeded access to designated military facilities, on the condition that Australian sovereignty is fully respected.
That American footprint is set to grow further next year, with as many as 1,200 US personnel expected to deploy to the HMAS Stirling naval base on Garden Island in Western Australia. Canberra maintains that the deployment amounts to a "rotation" rather than the establishment of a permanent base.
Former Defense Minister Christopher Pyne said the AUKUS security partnership linking Australia, the US, and the UK is "much more than submarine procurement," adding that it effectively establishes a new US submarine base in the Indian Ocean and hands Washington a "huge strategic advantage."
Current Defense Minister Richard Marles acknowledged that the "US presence is growing" in Australia, calling it vital to national security and confirming the American military footprint will continue expanding in the coming years.
Public Trust in US Slides Among Australians
Separately, polling suggests Australian confidence in the United States is eroding. A Lowy Institute survey found that only 31% of Australians trust the US to act responsibly in global affairs, while just 21% trust President Donald Trump to do the right thing internationally.
A separate poll by the Australia Institute found 59% of Australians believe the country's interests would be better served by a more independent foreign policy than by deepening its alliance with Washington.
Emma Shortis, director of the Australia Institute's international and security affairs program, argued that growing military integration with the US is steadily eroding Australia's capacity for independent, sovereign decision-making. Albert Palazzo of the University of New South Wales warned that the accelerating US military buildup threatens Australian security, accusing the government of "waltzing" the country toward a US-China war. Vince Scappatura, author of a book examining the US lobby's influence on Australian defense policy, described American basing access across the country as a "second wave of colonization," saying Australia is increasingly functioning as a "forward element" for projecting US military power in the region.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any
responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos,
licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues
related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Comments
No comment