Is Zurich Forcing Christian Homes To Tolerate Assisted Suicide?
I write about demographic developments, societal trends and debates in Switzerland. I joined SWI swissinfo after 15 years at a local newspaper in Zurich.
-
More from this aut
German Departm
Nothing less than Switzerland's core values are at stake: On September 27, canton Zurich will vote on an amendment to the Patient and Healthcare Act. If the public votes yes, all retirement and nursing homes will be forced to tolerate assisted suicide. Even those that currently reject it on principle.
The decision was forced by the Swiss assisted-dying organisations Exit and Dignitas. They submitted an initiative in Switzerland's largest and most populous canton that originally sought to go much further, demanding that assisted suicide also be permitted in psychiatric facilities and prisons.
The cantonal parliament rejected this and drafted a counterproposal, whereupon the initiators withdrew their proposal. Because conservative parties launched a referendum, the reform is now going to a public vote.
Autonomy – but for whom?As is globally known, assisted dying is liberally regulated in Switzerland. It is only punishable if pursued for selfish motives. For a long time, institutions could decide for themselves whether they wanted to accommodate this practice. This freedom of choice has been abolished by a number of cantons in recent years.
External ContentTo a large extent, this is also true in canton Zurich. Since 2023, all retirement and nursing homes here are required to tolerate assisted suicide if they have a public mandate and thus receive public funding. This applies to the vast majority of institutions – around 200 out of 220 homes, as the Tages-Anzeiger reports. The remaining 20 or so homes are private, mostly Christian-oriented facilities. A yes at the ballot box would force them to change their practice.
Is this ethically justifiable? The debate in Switzerland follows typical party lines. The small Christian parties, the Protestant Party and the Federal Democratic Union, which struggle with assisted dying anyway, reject the proposal. The right-wing Swiss People's Party is also opposed. Opponents take issue with the compulsion imposed on the few non-state-subsidised homes. The staff and residents there could be burdened by a situation that contradicts their value system.
Supporters – a broad coalition ranging from the political left to the centre – argue that the point is to avoid cases of hardship. Anyone who can no longer be transferred and decides on assisted suicide – perhaps contrary to earlier intentions – must have access to this act of self-determination.
The reference to hardship cases explicitly includes hospitals, which patients do not choose based on ideological alignment. However, hospitals generally already accept assisted suicide on their premises today if a transfer is no longer an option.
The Zurich cantonal government also points this out. It considers this practice sufficient and therefore rejects the proposal as well. The mandate of hospitals is to restore health. Where this is no longer possible, palliative care steps in. The cantonal government fears that this practice would be disrupted by a forced approach to assisted suicide.
Legal headwinds for opponentsDespite these concerns, the chances of the amendment being passed are good. Assisted suicide is widely accepted across broad sections of Swiss society; indeed, it represents that defiant self-determination that also shapes Swiss mythology.
More Demographics Why assisted suicide is 'normal' in SwitzerlandIn Switzerland, assisted suicide is considered a legitimate way to end your life.
Read more: Why assisted suicide is 'normal' in Switze
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any
responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos,
licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues
related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Comments
No comment