Why Michael Fried's Attacks On Literalism Matter As Never Before
At 87, American critic Michael Fried has received an unusually expansive summation of his career. Published by Bloomsbury in 2026,“Collected Writings: Essays, Poems, Interviews” brings together critical essays, prose-poems, and a book-length interview that functions as an intellectual autobiography. The result is less a monument to a single position than a portrait of a writer still testing what art can ask of its viewers.
Fried is best known for“Art and Objecthood,” his 1967 essay for Artforum. Written as Minimalism was taking shape, the text challenged the movement's literalness and theatricality, arguing against artworks that depend on the viewer's physical presence and self-awareness as part of the experience. The essay established Fried as a formidable defender of modernist absorption and made him a lasting target for critics who saw his position as overly conservative.
The new collection offers a broader and more nuanced account. Fried's prose-poems show a writer alert not only to visual structure but also to the rhythm of thought, the pressure of memory, and the tonal life of language. His criticism emerges as a form of sustained attention, resistant to the reflexive acceptance of whatever markets, trends, or cultural fashion present as inevitable.
That resistance is particularly resonant in the age of AI-generated art. Fried's objections to literalism anticipate a contemporary anxiety: whether images can command genuine attention when they are produced at scale, optimized for immediate effect, and detached from the difficult histories of making and looking. His alternative is not nostalgia for a fixed canon, but a demand for works capable of drawing viewers into a deeper, more absorbing encounter.
The artists he champions include Anthony Caro, his lifelong friend, as well as Kenneth Noland, Jeff Wall, Douglas Gordon, and Philippe Parreno. In an obituary for Caro, Fried recalled wishing that the sculptor's 2013 Gagosian exhibition had been marked by“something spectacularly out of the ordinary,” a response that captures his belief in art's capacity to exceed ordinary measures of appreciation.
The collection also turns toward Edward Said, Franz Kafka's Diaries, and Shakespeare's Coriolanus, while confronting the moral violence of the present, including the Israeli genocide of the Palestinians. Fried's commitments are therefore not reducible to a simple opposition between old and new, painting and sculpture, or modernism and its critics. They reflect a conviction that criticism should remain morally and politically alert while preserving art's mystery.
After six decades defending modernism, Fried appears here not as a relic of formalism but as an exacting advocate for attention itself. In a culture increasingly organized around speed and spectacle, that may be his most contemporary argument.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any
responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos,
licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues
related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Comments
No comment