Tuesday, 02 January 2024 12:17 GMT

Copper Fox Completes Preliminary Geometallurgical Model On Van Dyke ISCR Copper Project


(MENAFN- Newsfile Corp) Calgary, Alberta--(Newsfile Corp. - August 28, 2025) - Copper Fox Metals Inc. (TSXV: CUU) (OTCQX: CPFXF) (FSE: HPU) ("Copper Fox" or the "Company") , through its wholly owned subsidiary Desert Fox Van Dyke Co. , is pleased to provide the results of the Preliminary Geometallurgical Model completed by Samuel Engineering on its 100% owned Van Dyke in-situ copper recovery (ISCR) project located in the Globe-Miami Mining District, Gila County, Arizona (see news release dated June 23, 2025).

In 2020, Copper Fox announced the results of an updated Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) and Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) on Van Dyke using a US$3.15/lb copper price for the Base Case economic model. The PEA indicates annual production of 85 million pounds of Grade A copper cathode, at full capacity, utilizing the ISCR and solvent extraction and electrowinning (SX/EW) process. The study highlighted the following:

  • Project economics sensitive to copper price,
  • Significant exploration potential to increase resource base, and
  • A recommendation to advance the project to prefeasibility study (PFS) stage.

    Preliminary Geometallurgical Model (PGM)
    The PGM achieved three critical components for developing an updated geometallurgical model to support the completion of a PFS level of investigation by identifying the mineralogical domains (zones) in the Van Dyke deposit, "data gaps" in the project metallurgical results across the deposit and developed recommendations for future metallurgical testing.

    Elmer B. Stewart, President and CEO of Copper Fox, stated, "The PGM has identified the data gaps in the metallurgical coverage across the Van Dyke deposit and recommendations for future sampling to gain greater certainty on the metallurgical variability across the Van Dyke deposit. The PGM is a critical part of the Execution Plan that maps out the scope, timing and estimated cost of the studies required to meet the threshold of a PFS level study."

    Mineralogical Domains
    The mineralogical domains identified in the Van Dyke deposit are consistent with the general description of "Supergene" copper deposits (see Figure-1 and Table-1). At Van Dyke, the oxide and transition zones are the main zones of interest. Below the transition/chalcocite zones the mineralization, where present, consists of sporadic concentrations of chalcopyrite and pyrite.



    Figure-1: Cross section showing distribution of mineralogical zones within the Van Dyke copper deposit.

    To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:

    Table-1: General description of the mineralogical zones within the Van Dyke copper deposit.

  • Mineralogical Zone Description
    Leached Contains variable concentrations of clays and iron-oxides (limonite-hematite-goethite-jarosite). May contain trace concentrations of copper oxide minerals. Typically contains less than 200ppm total copper (TCu).
    Oxide Contains variable concentrations of azurite, malachite, and chrysocolla with lesser concentrations of cuprite and native copper. Contains greater than 250ppm acid soluble copper (ASCu) and very low concentrations of cyanide soluble copper (CNCu).
    Transition Contains variable concentrations of acid soluble and cyanide soluble copper minerals with gradual transition at depth from ASCu to more CNCu.
    Chalcocite Contains CNCu concentrations greater than 0.1%. CNCu concentration is typically three times higher than ASCu concentrations.

    Gap Analysis
    Metallurgical testwork at Van Dyke consists of; eight (8) pressure leach tests (PRT) on whole core samples in 2014 and, 65 bottle roll leach tests (BRT) in 2023 from selected drillholes located within the Phase I leaching plan (year 1-7) set out in the 2020 PEA. Data gaps in the metallurgical database represent potential risk of variability in copper extraction and recovery.

    The metallurgical testwork completed on similar deposits in Arizona was used to benchmark mineral characterization, process route selection and assessing processing risks for the Van Dyke project. The data from these tests were correlated spatially to the 2020 resource block model and the mineralogical domains identified within the Van Dyke deposit.

    Identification of the data gaps allows for pre-selection of representative sample locations within the mineralogical domains from future drillholes to support an updated geometallurgical model.

    Future Testwork Recommendations
    Recommendations for additional metallurgical testwork include using whole drill core samples to characterize the mineralization, identify mineralogy, BRT and corresponding PRT tests to establish correlation between the two tests, and their associated residue assays to evaluate/confirm optimum acid addition and consumption, leach cycle duration, and predicted copper extraction (Figure-2).

    The closed-cycle PRT tests should include solvent extraction of the pregnant leach solution and detailed mineralogical studies on head samples as well as leach residues for each test. The quantification of carbonates and clays should be performed on head samples.



    Figure-2: Plan view of the Van Dyke copper deposit show locations of existing and recommended metallurgical test sample locations. Blue = proposed metallurgical samples; Orange = 2023 BRTs; Green = 2014 PRTs.

    To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:

    Sampling Protocols
    Completion of the PGM established the following protocols for future metallurgical testing:

    • Sample preparation and analysis and bottle roll testing on a sub-sample of the head sample.
    • Testing protocols, PRT column height, leach solution chemistry, application rates or additional methods considering hydraulic pressure limits that include the following:
    • Consideration of higher initial acid content to improve leach cycle time.
    • Define sequential (multiple columns in series) tests to better understand transmissivity and its impact over time.
    • Consideration of reverse flow test for pH optimization.
    • Consideration of duplicate tests.
    • Assay/mineral studies on the leached sample residue.

    Qualified Person
    Elmer B. Stewart, MSc. P. Geol., President, and CEO of Copper Fox, is the Company's non-independent, nominated Qualified Person pursuant to National Instrument 43-101, Standards for Disclosure for Mineral Projects, and has reviewed and approves the scientific and technical information disclosed in this news release.

    About Copper Fox
    Copper Fox is a Canadian resource company focused on copper exploration and development in Canada and the United States. The principal assets of Copper Fox and its wholly owned subsidiaries, being Desert Fox Copper Inc., and Northern Fox Copper Inc. are the 100% ownership of the Van Dyke oxide copper project located in Miami, AZ, the 100% interest in the Mineral Mountain and Sombrero Butte porphyry copper exploration projects located in Arizona, the 25% interest in the Schaft Creek Joint Venture with Teck Resources Limited on the Schaft Creek copper-gold-molybdenum-silver project and the 100% owned Eaglehead polymetallic porphyry copper project each located in northwestern British Columbia. For more information on Copper Fox's mineral properties and investments visit the Company's website at .

    On behalf of the Board of Directors,

    Elmer B. Stewart
    President and Chief Executive Officer

    MENAFN28082025004218003983ID1109987738

    Legal Disclaimer:
    MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

    Search