America's Kryptonite? Just Say China 'Gray Zone'

For most of the last 30
years, the Americans even convinced themselves that the PRC wasn't much of a threat if gray zone was all they could do. Thus, no need to get America's own defenses in order.

This reflects two different conceptions of war. Americans require gunplay and an official statement that we're at war. Until then, we reckon there's still a chance to make friends and are inclined to overlook all sorts of unfriendly behavior.

The Chinese Communists, however, see war as a spectrum involving a range of actions that harm and disadvantage the enemy – setting it up for defeat. And most of those activities don't involve kinetic activity such as
shooting.

China's Coast Guard, People's Liberation Army (PLA) Navy, maritime militia and fishing fleet are hard power tools Beijing has used to take de facto control of the South China Sea over the last decade – mostly in actions that have been“threat deflated” by calling them gray zone.

But look at the outcomes: effective control over some of the most strategic and economically important waters in the world, shored up by new artificial islands/military outposts, resulting in a demoralization of our friends and a questioning of our commitment.

China's intentions were obvious. But it seemed just not worth doing much to stop them. One USINDOPACOM commander even condescendingly laughed off the buildup as“the great wall of sand.”

We act as though avoiding anything“escalatory” is the main thing when deciding on a response. That usually means backing off. Meanwhile, the other side risks lives and just might not care if somebody got killed. In fact, China might welcome it in some cases.

In the case of Japan, China would like the Japanese to fire just one shot – and the PRC would claim to have been provoked into a fierce, kinetic response that involves grabbing territory. The same with the Philippines.

Gray zone is more than the South China Sea and it doesn't just involve military and paramilitary operations. Nor is it always directed against military targets.

PRC gray zone drug warfare is already killing Americans by the hundreds of thousands.
The fentanyl onslaught killed over 70,000 Americans last year (while injuring far more) and the total Chinese fentanyl butcher's bill is up toward one million Americans over the last decade.

But since it's the gray zone, we don't fight back. Not the Democrats, not the Republicans.

Chinese cyber warfare stole most of the US Office of Personnel Management's files on 23 million Americans holding security clearances as well as the blueprints for F35 fighter and C17 transport designs.

Also stolen: limitless amounts of US corporate intellectual property, a crime that destroyed entire sectors of the American economy. And the perpetrators are setting up in our key infrastructure, ready to hit us.

The penalties? Next to nothing. It's gray zone, after all. Can't risk nuclear war or upsetting Wall Street and the US-China Business Council, you know. This is hurting us badly and weakening our national defenses while giving the PRC the advantage.

What should we do?

First, recognize it for what it is. The Filipinos, who have been under constant attack, have rejected the term gray zone completely and now call the ramming of their ships and attempts to seize their territory what it is: illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive (ICAD) actions.

Put even more clearly, these so-called gray zone acts are acts of war.

Our response doesn't need to match directly the offending behavior. Nor need it be proportional or '”in kind.” But it needs to make the other side regret having done what they did and afraid they'll get hurt even more if they continue.

Sign up for one of our free newsletters

• The Daily Report Start your day right with Asia Times' top stories
• AT Weekly Report A weekly roundup of Asia Times' most-read stories

This requires a willingness to take some risk. If you won't take risks the aggressor has the advantage. If Chinese ships are interfering and asking for collision, don't back off. If they are pumping drugs into the US, hit them hard – even if Wall Street complains or things at Wal-Mart cost a little more.

Perhaps suspend the People's Bank of China from the US dollar system for a year. Or maybe a total technology export ban – sudden and enforced. And to really hit them, expose the CCP top leadership's personal corruption.

But will we? One wonders. For America's elite, it seems that nothing is ever quite worth pushing back over. It's the fear of escalation that's part and parcel of gray-zone paralysis. America's elite can always convince themselves it's the“adult” or“statesmanlike” approach.

But don't be surprised if the Chinese keep pushing and making life miserable for our friends in Japan and the Philippines – and for Americans who lose family members to fentanyl and jobs to Chinese companies built off the theft of American technology.

And it doesn't get any easier the longer you wait. It gets harder. And when the PRC's friends – Russia, North Korea, Iran, Venezuela and Cuba – step up their own gray zone activities, encouraged by China's success, things will get much worse.

Usually, paralysis is caused by an external stimulus or something outside one's control.
But when it comes to gray-zone paralysis, it's entirely our choice.

Grant Newsham is a retired US Marine officer and former US diplomat. He was the first Marine liaison officer to the Japan Self Defense Force, and is a fellow at the Center for Security Policy and the Yorktown Institute. He is the author of the book, When China Attacks: A Warning To America.

This article was first published by The Sunday Guardian . It is republished with permission.

Already have an account? Sign i Sign up here to comment on Asia Times stories OR

Thank you for registering!

An account was already registered with this email. Please check your inbox for an authentication link.