IUML Moves Supreme Court Against CAA Implementation, Terms It 'Discriminatory'
As a key player challenging the CAA through a series of writ petitions, IUML argues that the legislation's presumed constitutionality is not applicable when the law is considered "manifestly arbitrary." Contending that the Act, by tying citizenship to religion, is "prima facie unconstitutional and discriminatory," IUML urges the Supreme Court to intervene and issue a stay order.
'Not acceptable': Thalapathy Vijay denounces CAA, calls for Tamil Nadu's opposition
The political party emphasizes that the deferment of CAA's implementation, which remained inactive for 4.5 years, wouldn't cause any prejudice but would prevent potential complications if citizenship granted under the act were later revoked.
IUML has maintained its position, clarifying that its objection lies in the religious exclusion aspect and not against granting citizenship to migrants. It suggests making the implementation religion-neutral to align with the Constitution's basic structure of secularism.
On Monday, the CAA was put into effect with the Centre notifying the rules four years after its contentious passage in Parliament. The law aims to expedite citizenship for undocumented non-Muslim migrants from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan who entered India before December 31, 2014.
Supreme Court directs Centre to consider special package for Kerala as one time measure amid financial crisis
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Comments
No comment