It's time to talk about who can access your digital genomic data


(MENAFN- The Conversation) We are approaching a time when you might be too scared to have your genome sequenced.

Only last week, a into the privacy policies of direct-to-consumer DNA companies. But this is only one piece of a puzzle that is about to get much more connected.

As with any kind of personal data there are a number of concerns regarding collection, transmission, storage and use. But unlike most other data, your genome reveals intimate information about not only you, but also the people to whom you are related.

It's time to talk about who can access that data, how, when and why.

Read more:

The current situation

Genetic databases are not new. For a while we have had , , and , among others.

Historically there has been a natural separation between these databases, because they tend to contain different types of genetic data. Medical genetic databases, for example, have typically screened specific genes, and this data is usually not variable enough to be useful in law enforcement.

Additionally, some databases have been governed by specific rules, such as those that limit .

This is changing. The unit of genetic 'currency' is becoming the same thing: the sequence of the entire human genome.

The rise of the genomes Genome sequencing at the Sanger institute. Sanger Institute, Genome Research Limited

The rate of genome sequencing is increasing rapidly. Massive genomics projects are set to emerge in the , , , and elsewhere.

The has launched a that aims to combine genetic and health data for one million people. China is investing more than in a – the pilot stage alone includes one million human genomes.

It's not just governments. Private companies have also set their sights on massive human genome datasets. Craig Venter's is planning to sequence and has to work towards this goal.

The marketplace of corporate, companies is also rapidly expanding. Amazon (which claimed 45% of online sales on a record-breaking Black Friday) reported the .

Read more:

It's impossible to put a precise figure on the number of genomes that have been sequenced to date. Projects like in the US point to a future in which genome sequencing may be a routine screen at birth.

Genome data is not anonymous

Keeping databases separate and anonymous may seem like a solution but this will be very . It is already possible, at least in some instances, to use information from a complete genome to locate the donor through searches of publicly .

Faceless data? Gerd Altmann (geralt) @ pixabay

More recently, a study claimed to be able to de-anonymise genomic data using . In reality – but the will certainly accelerate our understanding of these links.

Read more:

Who wants your data, and why?

Your genetic data could be useful to three main groups in society.

1. Law enforcement

have already begun to blur the lines that have typically kept these databases apart. The controversial process of shows how data may be used from ancestry databases to make inferences about a suspect. In the US, the existence of federally may create further complication.

The establishment of mandatory DNA testing seems far-fetched, however that may not be the case everywhere. In 2015, Kuwait passed a from all citizens and residents, although this was earlier this year.

Closer to home, NSW Police Minister Michael Gallacher proposed that mandatory DNA collection from all newborns in Australia was '. Australia is not averse to surveillance of its population, as we have discovered with the . This system goes into effect in 2018, and both and are pushing for access.

2. Private industry

Commercial DNA test providers can be to hand over customer data . The that consumers agree to make it impossible to know who else will have access to the data.

What is clear is that a digitised genome has monetary value. Genetic data from direct-to-consumer companies has already to .

3. Insurance companies

Our digital genomes provide information about our predisposition to various medical conditions and this is attractive to insurance companies. The predictive power of the genome is only going to . Once a consumer has taken a genetic test, they may be required to disclose that fact to an insurer or risk fraud charges.

What's more, legislation protecting consumers from genetic discrimination is inadequate, and . is already being impacted in Australia.

Read more:

Let's talk about the future

Australia just created its first , for 2018-20, and this begins to create guidelines for genomic data. This policy is geared towards medical research, however, so would not apply to consumer DNA services, and does not make provisions for law enforcement access requests.

and are being explored as a way to and who can access it. claims to offer a commercial, decentralised, blockchain system based on buying genetic services and selling access to genetic information.

Perhaps these approaches are part of the technological solution. But the central issue is this: should we own our genetic data, and should we as individuals be able to decide who can access it?

What is absolutely clear is that the future of genomic databases is almost here, and now is the time to figure out how we are going to allow this information to be used.


The Conversation

MENAFN0312201701990000ID1096182359


Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.