Analysts Say Iran Conflict Evolving into Prolonged War of Attrition

(MENAFN) The ongoing conflict involving Iran is increasingly being characterized by analysts as a prolonged war of attrition, with no clear pathway to a decisive military outcome, according to reports.

Experts cited in reporting argue that the confrontation is shifting away from conventional battlefield gains and toward sustained pressure strategies, including economic strain, political leverage, and long-term military endurance.

A senior academic at King’s College London, Ahron Bregman, described the situation as “a test of patience,” suggesting that the key question is which side will be able to endure the prolonged pressure for the longest period.

According to reports, the conflict escalated following exchanges involving the United States and Israel launching strikes against Iran in late February, which were followed by retaliatory actions by Tehran targeting regional US allies, including states in the Gulf.

The resulting escalation has also been linked to disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global shipping route. According to analysts, these disruptions have contributed to rising global energy costs while simultaneously adding economic strain on Iran itself.

Reports indicate that diplomatic efforts to end the conflict have so far produced limited progress. A recent Iranian response to a US proposal was reportedly transmitted through Pakistan but rejected by US President Donald Trump as unacceptable.

According to reports, the humanitarian toll of the conflict has been significant, with thousands killed and large-scale displacement reported in Iran, as well as additional casualties in Israel and neighboring Gulf states.

Economists and military analysts cited in reports emphasize that economic pressure has become a central component of the conflict, with inflation in Iran reaching elevated levels amid ongoing instability and sanctions pressure.

Military analyst Marina Miron of King’s College London noted that economic disruption has become a core objective of the conflict strategy, describing it as fundamentally focused on weakening opposing systems through sustained pressure.

According to reports, observers increasingly view the conflict not as a short-term confrontation but as a drawn-out strategic struggle shaped by endurance, resource management, and political will on all sides.

MENAFN17052026000045017281ID1111127389