(MENAFN- The Rio Times) Ecuadorians head to the polls on Sunday to answer four questions that could reset how the country is governed and how it fights organized crime.

The ballot doubles as a measure of President Daniel Noboa's grip on a restless nation after a year of security shocks and tight public finances. The most far-reaching question is whether to call a Constituent Assembly to draft a new constitution.

Supporters see a clean reboot to unclog slow institutions and clarify who does what across branches of government. Critics warn that a full rewrite invites months of uncertainty, slows basic governing, and concentrates power in the hands of those who control the drafting rules.

Another headline item asks whether Ecuador should allow foreign military installations, currently banned by the constitution. Backers argue that deeper cooperation would bring training, equipment, and joint operations against trafficking routes along the Pacific.

Opponents see a slippery slope on sovereignty and worry about long-term commitments that outlast governments without fixing policing, courts, and prisons at home.



Two structural changes complete the package. One would reduce the size of the National Assembly to cut costs and speed lawmaking.
Ecuador weighs political reform between discipline and risk
The other would end mandatory public financing for political parties. Advocates say leaner institutions and less automatic funding encourage discipline and curb clientelism.

Detractors counter that a smaller chamber can sideline minorities and that eliminating public funds risks pushing campaigns toward private patrons and opaque money. The story behind the story is straightforward: voters are choosing between a tune-up and a teardown.

A strong“yes” bloc would hand the government momentum to tighten security partnerships and streamline politics. A mixed verdict would force compromise, keeping reforms incremental and negotiated.

Why this matters beyond Ecuador: the country is dollarized, straddles key Pacific shipping lanes, and hosts ports and energy assets tied to regional supply chains.

A result that favors clearer rules, budget realism, and practical security cooperation signals a steadier operating environment for investors and neighbors.

A sweeping rewrite could still pay off-but it carries transition risks that criminal networks and political spoilers can exploit faster than institutions can be rebuilt.

MENAFN10112025007421016031ID1110323122